1988
DOI: 10.2527/jas1988.6651153x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of Genetic Parameters and Predicted Selection Responses for Growth, Fat and Lean Traits in Mice

Abstract: Heritabilities (ĥ2) and genetic correlations (rG) were estimated by regression of offspring on sire in two replicate, unselected lines of mice. Traits were associated with growth, feed efficiency, fat deposition and lean tissue. The ĥ2 for growth traits ranged from .34 to .42, except for 3-wk body weight, which was only .05. The ĥ2 for feed efficiency was .28. Ranges in ĥ2 were .45 to .50 for fat deposition traits and .36 to .42 for lean tissue traits. The rG involving 3-wk to 6-wk feed efficiency with hind ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
12
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(35 reference statements)
8
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I) for W21 (0.15) was lower than that for W42 (0.21), which was in agreement with the results reported by Eisen and Prasetyo [5] and, in a seminal paper, by Falconer [6]. Estimated heritabilities for these two traits were also in close agreement with those reported by Fernández et al [7] for litter weight using DFREML [23] on the same mice population as analysed here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…I) for W21 (0.15) was lower than that for W42 (0.21), which was in agreement with the results reported by Eisen and Prasetyo [5] and, in a seminal paper, by Falconer [6]. Estimated heritabilities for these two traits were also in close agreement with those reported by Fernández et al [7] for litter weight using DFREML [23] on the same mice population as analysed here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These two characters showed heritabilities of 0.53 and 0.58, values higher than comparable estimates for young mice found in some previous studies with outbred populations [9,22,31,32]. On the other hand, Cheverud et al [11] discovered that QTL identified from an intercross of the Large and Small inbred strains accounted for 56% and 62%, respectively, of the variation in body weight in mice three weeks and six weeks of age.…”
Section: Genetic and Environmental Variancesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Reported genetic correlation estimates from sib analyses of broilers (McCarthy and Siegel, 1983;Becker et al, 1984), turkeys (Havenstein et al, 1988b), quail (Sadjadi and Becker, 1980;Garwood and Diehl, 1987), and mice (Eisen and Prasetyo, 1988) all suggest that selection for decreased fatness alone will also decrease BW. A major selection goal of broiler and turkey breeding companies has been to select for high BW at a given age.…”
Section: Torttf Et Almentioning
confidence: 96%