2018
DOI: 10.1134/s1064562418070074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates for Solutions to Fokker–Planck–Kolmogorov Equations with Integrable Drifts

Abstract: We prove two new results connected with elliptic Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equations with drifts integrable with respect to solutions. The first result answers negatively a long-standing question and shows that a density of a probability measure satisfying the Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equation with a drift integrable with respect to this density can fail to belong to the Sobolev class W 1,1 (R d ). There is also a version of this result for densities with respect to Gaussian measures. The second new result give… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as well as its infinite-dimensional analog, which is a constructive sufficient condition for the uniform integrability of the densities of finite-dimensional projections of solutions to infinite-dimensional equations with respect to the corresponding Gaussian measures. It has recently been shown in [14] that these results on Sobolev differentiability of densities break down in the L 1 -setting. It can happen that |b| ∈ L 1 (µ), but the solution density ̺ does not belong to the Sobolev class W 1,1 (R d ), i.e., |∇̺| does not belong to L 1 (R d ), and similarly for the density f the condition |v| ∈ L 1 (γ) does not guarantee that the function |∇f | belongs to L 1 (γ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…as well as its infinite-dimensional analog, which is a constructive sufficient condition for the uniform integrability of the densities of finite-dimensional projections of solutions to infinite-dimensional equations with respect to the corresponding Gaussian measures. It has recently been shown in [14] that these results on Sobolev differentiability of densities break down in the L 1 -setting. It can happen that |b| ∈ L 1 (µ), but the solution density ̺ does not belong to the Sobolev class W 1,1 (R d ), i.e., |∇̺| does not belong to L 1 (R d ), and similarly for the density f the condition |v| ∈ L 1 (γ) does not guarantee that the function |∇f | belongs to L 1 (γ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%