2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60058-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated effect of alcohol pricing policies on health and health economic outcomes in England: an epidemiological model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
188
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
11
188
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…25 The Sheffi eld Alcohol Policy Model 17 predicts that an MUP delivers a greater reduction in alcohol-related harm than overall increases in taxation, with almost double the number of deaths prevented. 26 Further evidence for the effectiveness of an MUP comes from long-running natural experiments in Canada, where signifi cant reductions in alcohol consumption followed increases in minimum prices in government liquor stores, despite these outlets representing only a minority of the retail market, 27,28 with a 10% increase in minimum price resulting in a 32% fall in deaths directly attributable to alcohol. 29 as a result, they purchase the cheapest alcohol it is possible to buy, paying less than one-third of the price paid by low-risk drinkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The Sheffi eld Alcohol Policy Model 17 predicts that an MUP delivers a greater reduction in alcohol-related harm than overall increases in taxation, with almost double the number of deaths prevented. 26 Further evidence for the effectiveness of an MUP comes from long-running natural experiments in Canada, where signifi cant reductions in alcohol consumption followed increases in minimum prices in government liquor stores, despite these outlets representing only a minority of the retail market, 27,28 with a 10% increase in minimum price resulting in a 32% fall in deaths directly attributable to alcohol. 29 as a result, they purchase the cheapest alcohol it is possible to buy, paying less than one-third of the price paid by low-risk drinkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has consistently demonstrated that reducing affordability is an effective tool for reducing alcohol consumption and related harms in the general population (Chikritzhs et al, 2009;Lhachimi et al, 2012;Purshouse, Meier, Brennan, Taylor, & Rafia, 2010;Wagenaar, Salois, & Komro, 2009). Demand for alcohol typically decreases as price increases, with individual variation around elasticity (change in demand relative to change in price), maximum alcohol expenditure on alcohol and breakpoint (the price at which alcohol consumption is reduced to zero) resulting in the effects extending to populations known to be 'at-risk', such as heavy drinkers and young people (Chikritzhs et al, 2009;MacKillop et al, 2010;Murphy, MacKillop, Skidmore, & Pederson, 2009;Osterberg, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the Australian sample stated drinking culture as the most common direct causal factor, and rated as one of the strongest causes of binge drinking. These findings are important given the recent focus of alcohol pricing as being a key cause of binge drinking [28,29], and recent proposed of government policies that aim to tackle alcohol misuse and binge drinking by regulating the price of alcohol [25]. Perhaps consistent persuasive public health messages coupled with changes in legislation may be effective in changing social norms and cultural expectations surrounding excessive alcohol consumption, analogous to how drink-driving campaigns have transformed attitudes and behaviour toward driving while intoxicated in the past 20 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%