2010
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.100488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated cumulative incidence of pandemic (H1N1) influenza among pregnant women during the first wave of the 2009 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
26
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A study conducted in Beijing in the pre-pandemic period suggested that the prevalence of pre-existing cross-reactive antibodies against the H1N1pdm virus was 1.6% among 310 nonpregnant women of reproductive age (20-45 years old) (unpublished data). This rate was lower than the 4% and 7% reported for Western Australia [15] and Canada [16], respectively, which may be related to seasonal influenza vaccination [17]. In the present study, of 136 serum samples collected after the high pandemic wave, 23 (16.9%) were positive.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study conducted in Beijing in the pre-pandemic period suggested that the prevalence of pre-existing cross-reactive antibodies against the H1N1pdm virus was 1.6% among 310 nonpregnant women of reproductive age (20-45 years old) (unpublished data). This rate was lower than the 4% and 7% reported for Western Australia [15] and Canada [16], respectively, which may be related to seasonal influenza vaccination [17]. In the present study, of 136 serum samples collected after the high pandemic wave, 23 (16.9%) were positive.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…This high rate indicates that a majority of the women in group 2 may have been infected because none had been vaccinated. Considering that a higher prevalence of pre-existing antibodies may be observed in older pregnant women [16], women testing positive and women testing negative were compared within 2 age groups to control for the confounding factor of age. However, the inclusion of age subgroups may have reduced the statistical power of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44% of the participants were in their second trimester of pregnancy. In contrast to 10 to 20% prevalence in other studies conducted in India and other countries, 15,16 very high proportion (98.6%) of pregnant women were sero-converted during the pandemic in Kerala.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…[28][29][30][31]). We define the basic reproduction number R 0 ¼ kbðtÞl=g [32], where the expectation is taken over the time window that we model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%