2016
DOI: 10.6018/analesps.33.1.233301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estados de ánimo al jugar en solitario o en cooperación: dos vivencias motrices y afectivas desiguales

Abstract: <span style="font-family: 'Garamond',serif; font-size: 8pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">This study analyzed the effect of the variables: </span><span style="font-family: 'Garamond',serif; font-size: 8pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
24
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings confirm that it is the main predictive variable to interpret the decisional quality of the students' interventions. Previous experiences with motor games indicate the preference of girls for cooperation, while boys are comfortable with antagonistic relationships (Lavega, Alonso et al, 2014, Muñoz et al, 2017. In relation to the alleged inability of the boys to cooperate, it has been questioned that they are incapable of doing it but, supported again the boys' fondness for antagonism (Kivikangas, Kätsyri, Järvelä & Ravaja, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings confirm that it is the main predictive variable to interpret the decisional quality of the students' interventions. Previous experiences with motor games indicate the preference of girls for cooperation, while boys are comfortable with antagonistic relationships (Lavega, Alonso et al, 2014, Muñoz et al, 2017. In relation to the alleged inability of the boys to cooperate, it has been questioned that they are incapable of doing it but, supported again the boys' fondness for antagonism (Kivikangas, Kätsyri, Järvelä & Ravaja, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a context of motor game (Cantó & Ruiz, 2005), girls experience more intense positive emotions than boys when practicing the same cooperative games (Lavega, Lagardera, March, Rovira & Aráujo, 2014). Subsequently, it is noted that cooperation is preferred by girls while boys opt for rivalry (Lavega, Alonso, Etxebeste, Lagardera & March, 2014;Muñoz, Lavega, Serna, Sáez de Ocáriz & March, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This first level of analysis was used to study the predictive capacity of variables internal to the games, such as domains of motor action (psychomotor, cooperation, opposition, 5 CIENCIAS HUMANAS Y SOCIALES -FORO "JOSÉ MARÍA CAGIGAL" | SOCIAL SCIENCES -"JOSÉ MARÍA CAGIGAL" FORUM Metodología cualitativa en el estudio del juego tradicional | Qualitative Methodology in the Study of Traditional Games de oposición, de cooperación-oposición), competición (ganar, perder, no competir), así como externas a los juegos: género (masculino, femenino), historial deportivo (con o sin historial), organización del alumnado (grupos mixtos o segregados). Se ha observado que los dominios de acción motriz y el factor competición funcionan como las variables predictivas más potentes para explicar el bienestar o malestar (Duran & Costes, 2018;Duran et al, 2014;Lavega et al, 2017;Muñoz et al, 2017). Estos primeros resultados estadísticos, resultantes del primer nivel de análisis, se han visto enriquecidos mediante la estrategia metodológica de métodos mixtos.…”
Section: Consequences Of the Qualitative Methodology Appliedunclassified
“…CIENCIAS HUMANAS Y SOCIALES -FORO "JOSÉ MARÍA CAGIGAL" | SOCIAL SCIENCES -"JOSÉ MARÍA CAGIGAL" FORUM Metodología cualitativa en el estudio del juego tradicional | Qualitative Methodology in the Study of Traditional Games Numerosas investigaciones realizadas constatan que cada uno de estos dominios originan consecuencias distintas sobre la conducta motriz de las personas participantes, ya sea sobre aspectos de relación interpersonal (Parlebas, 2012), de cohesión del grupo (Andueza & Lavega, 2017;Parlebas, 2010), de integración (Lavega, Planas, & Ruiz, 2014), o de conflictos (Collard & Oboeuf, 2007;Dugas, 2008;Sáez de Ocáriz & Lavega, 2015), como de transferencia de aprendizajes decisionales (Parlebas & Vives, 1969;Parlebas & Dugas, 1998), como también en la vivencia de emociones (Duran & Costes, 2018;Duran et al, 2014;Lavega, Alonso, Etxebeste, Lagardera, & March, 2014;Lavega, Sáez de Ocáriz, Lagardera, March, & Puig, 2017;Muñoz, Lavega, Serna, Sáez de Ocáriz, & March, 2017).…”
Section: Domains Of Motor Action and Emotionsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation