Establishment of the MGI EDM calibration baseline

Božić, Branko; Fan, Huaan; Milosavljevic, Z.

doi:10.1179/1752270611y.0000000030

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For calibration, outdoor pillar baselines of lengths typically between 800 and 1500 m are set up. Distances between forced centerings on the pillars are typically determined with a precision from 0.5 to 4.0 mm (in case of the new determinations up to 0.3 ppm·D or less) [ 13 , 14 ]. The absolute sizes of the errors are determined at the pillar bases as the difference between the length and the directly measured distance [ 15 , 16 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suppression of Systematic Errors of Electronic Distance Meters for Measurement of Short Distances

Braun¹,

Štroner²,

Urban³

et al. 2015

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In modern industrial geodesy, high demands are placed on the final accuracy, with expectations currently falling below 1 mm. The measurement methodology and surveying instruments used have to be adjusted to meet these stringent requirements, especially the total stations as the most often used instruments. A standard deviation of the measured distance is the accuracy parameter, commonly between 1 and 2 mm. This parameter is often discussed in conjunction with the determination of the real accuracy of measurements at very short distances (5–50 m) because it is generally known that this accuracy cannot be increased by simply repeating the measurement because a considerable part of the error is systematic. This article describes the detailed testing of electronic distance meters to determine the absolute size of their systematic errors, their stability over time, their repeatability and the real accuracy of their distance measurement. Twenty instruments (total stations) have been tested, and more than 60,000 distances in total were measured to determine the accuracy and precision parameters of the distance meters. Based on the experiments’ results, calibration procedures were designed, including a special correction function for each instrument, whose usage reduces the standard deviation of the measurement of distance by at least 50%.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suppression of Systematic Errors of Electronic Distance Meters for Measurement of Short Distances

Braun¹,

Štroner²,

Urban³

et al. 2015

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Correspondence on 'Establishment of the MGI EDM calibration baseline' by B. Bozic, H. Fan and Z. Milosavljevic Sir, In a recent article on the determination of the length of a standard EDM baseline in Serbia [1], the authors discuss the design, the measurements (1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002) and the derivation of the length of an EDM baseline. The discussion of the design and the measurement procedures is quite detailed.…”

Section: Letter To the Editormentioning

confidence: 98%

Correspondence on ‘Establishment of the MGI EDM calibration baseline’ by B. Bozic, H. Fan and Z. Milosavljevic

Rüeger

2013

Survey Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geodetic calibration network for total stations and GNSS receivers in sub-kilometer distances with sub-millimeter precision

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Establishment of the MGI EDM calibration baseline

Cited by 5 publications

References 2 publications

Suppression of Systematic Errors of Electronic Distance Meters for Measurement of Short Distances

Suppression of Systematic Errors of Electronic Distance Meters for Measurement of Short Distances

Correspondence on ‘Establishment of the MGI EDM calibration baseline’ by B. Bozic, H. Fan and Z. Milosavljevic

Geodetic calibration network for total stations and GNSS receivers in sub-kilometer distances with sub-millimeter precision

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About