2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672306008299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing interspecific mosaic genome lines between Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila pallidosa by means of parthenogenesis

Abstract: Strong sexual isolation exists between the closely related species Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa, but there is no obvious post-mating isolation; both sexes of the hybrids and their descendants appear to be completely viable and fertile. Strains exhibiting parthenogenesis have been derived from wild populations of both species. We intercrossed such strains and established iso-female lines after the second generation of parthenogenesis. These lines are clones, carrying homozygous chromosomes that are int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selected markers close to hypothesized TRDL were finally tested for distorted segregation ratios in a second population with the same cytoplasm as the one in which the effect was initially observed. Segregation data were further explored for negative nuclearnuclear and nuclear-nuclear-cytoplasmic (i.e., between a cytoplasmic and two nuclear loci) genic interactions by testing for deviations between the expected and the observed frequency of recombinant and nonrecombinant genotypes between markers from different linkage groups (see also Gadau et al 1999;Sawamura et al 2006), assuming an independent assortment of markers on different chromosomes. The tests were performed with the help of a Perl script using the x 2 test for goodness of fit (d.f.…”
Section: Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selected markers close to hypothesized TRDL were finally tested for distorted segregation ratios in a second population with the same cytoplasm as the one in which the effect was initially observed. Segregation data were further explored for negative nuclearnuclear and nuclear-nuclear-cytoplasmic (i.e., between a cytoplasmic and two nuclear loci) genic interactions by testing for deviations between the expected and the observed frequency of recombinant and nonrecombinant genotypes between markers from different linkage groups (see also Gadau et al 1999;Sawamura et al 2006), assuming an independent assortment of markers on different chromosomes. The tests were performed with the help of a Perl script using the x 2 test for goodness of fit (d.f.…”
Section: Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ana-Im, y and pal-Im, + strains had been established by isolating virgin females from the original strains, where Im stands for ''impaternate''. Females from interspecific mosaic genome lines constructed by crossing ana-Im, y females and pal-Br, + males were examined for the present analysis; Sawamura et al (2006) have established 266 lines and 239 of them were examined here (the others had been accidentally lost before the mating test). Males used for the mating experiments are from the iso-female lines, D. ananassae TBU209 and D. pallidosa TBU155, both of which were originally captured in Tongatapu, Tonga, by Fuyama, Takanashi (Matsuura), and Tobari in 1981(Tomimura et al 1993).…”
Section: Fliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic constitution of each interspecific mosaic genome line has been determined (Sawamura et al 2006). Eight molecular markers were used other than the visible marker y for XL (cytological position, 5D).…”
Section: Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sexual isolation, maintained by strong mating preferences has been reported between the light and dark forms of D. ananassae in laboratory stocks (Futch 1966). These forms were found to be sibling species (D. ananassae and D. pallidosa) of the ananassae complex which show strong sexual isolation (Futch 1973;Doi et al 2001;Sawamura et al 2006;Vishalakshi and Singh 2006). In spite of their sympatric distribution, post-mating reproductive barriers such as hybrid sterility or hybrid inviability do not exist between them (Futch 1966;Bock and Wheeler 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%