2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-007-9198-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of female mating recognition between Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila pallidosa: application of interspecific mosaic genome lines

Abstract: Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila pallidosa are closely related species that can produce viable and fertile hybrids of both sexes, although strong sexual isolation exists between the two species. Females are thought to discriminate conspecific from heterospecific males based on their courtship songs. The genetic basis of female discrimination behavior was analyzed using isogenic females from interspecific mosaic genome lines that carry homozygous recombinant chromosomes. Multiple regression analysis indicate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Behavioral isolation loci between D. santomea and D. yakuba were found near the centromere on 3R [7], and near the telomere for both the D. simulans and D. mauritiana species pair [6] and the M and Z forms of D. melanogaster [92]. Loci responsible for the behavioral isolation between D. ananassae and D. pallidosa [121], and the isolation between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis [84] all fell within interspecific inversion polymorphisms. Although this was not true for the regions responsible for increased behavioral isolation caused by reinforcement in the latter species pair [109], these loci for reinforcement were not confirmed by further studies [124].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Behavioral isolation loci between D. santomea and D. yakuba were found near the centromere on 3R [7], and near the telomere for both the D. simulans and D. mauritiana species pair [6] and the M and Z forms of D. melanogaster [92]. Loci responsible for the behavioral isolation between D. ananassae and D. pallidosa [121], and the isolation between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis [84] all fell within interspecific inversion polymorphisms. Although this was not true for the regions responsible for increased behavioral isolation caused by reinforcement in the latter species pair [109], these loci for reinforcement were not confirmed by further studies [124].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for D. ananassae female's willingness to mate with D. pallidosa males. All of the identified regions had species specific inversions [121], suggesting that regions of the genome with reduced recombination between the species may be more likely to harbor behavioral isolation loci.…”
Section: Genetic Basis Of Female Behavioral Isolation For Differenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, inversion polymorphism may have a partial behavioral basis and males may be more subject to intrasexual selection than females (Singh and Chatterjee 1986). Multiple regression analysis by using interspecific mosaic genome lines of D. ananassae and D. pallidosa indicated highly significant effects on 2L for female mating willingness with D. ananassae males and on XL, 2L and 3R for that with D. pallidosa males (Sawamura et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ananassae. Arrow indicates the discrimination between groups of females (Square) to particular males (Oval) Multiple regression analysis by using interspecific mosaic genome lines of D.ananassae and D. pallidosa indicated highly significant effects on 2L for female mating willingness with D.ananassae males and on XL, 2L and 3R for that with D. pallidosa males (Sawamura et al 2008). Behavioural isolation has been found between two karyotypically different homozygous strains of D. ananassae derived from same geographic population which shows that chromosome arrangements may affect mate recognition system in D. ananassae (Nanda and Singh 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%