Essential Requirements for Establishing and Operating Data Trusts

Abstract

Introduction: Increasingly, the label “data trust” is being applied to repeatable mechanisms or approaches to sharing data in a timely, fair, safe and equitable way. However, there is a gap in terms of practical guidance about how to establish and operate a data trust.
 
 Aim and Approach: In December 2019, the Canadian Institute for Health Information and the Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence convened a working meeting of 19 people representing 15 Canadian organizations/initiatives involved in data sharing, most of which focus on public sector health data. The objective was to identify essential requirements for the establishment and operation of data trusts. Preliminary findings were presented during the meeting then refined as participants and co-authors identified relevant literature and contributed to this manuscript.
 
 Results: Twelve (12) minimum specification requirements (“min specs”) for data trusts were identified. The foundational min spec is that data trusts must meet all legal requirements, including legal authority to collect, hold or share data. In addition, there was agreement that data trusts must have (i) an accountable governing body which ensures the data trust advances its stated purpose and is transparent, (ii) comprehensive data management including responsible parties and clear processes for the collection, storage, access, disclosure and use of data, (iii) training and accountability requirements for all data users and (iv) ongoing public and stakeholder engagement.
 Conclusion / Implications: Based on a review of the literature and advice from participants from 15 Canadian organizations/initiatives, practical guidance in the form of twelve min specs for data trusts were agreed on. Public engagement and continued exchange of insights and experience is recommended on this evolving topic.

‘To me, it's ones and zeros, but in reality that one is death’: A qualitative study exploring researchers' experience of involving and engaging seldom‐heard communities in big data research

“…The findings confirm that defining a group as a seldom‐heard group is context‐specific 33,49 . The participants named numerous types of seldom‐heard communities involved and engaged within the context of their work.…”

“…The findings confirm that defining a group as a seldom-heard group is context-specific. 33,49 The participants named numerous types of seldom-heard communities involved and engaged within the context of their work. Researchers should reflect on who would be the most seldom-heard group within the context of their study and recognize that this might include more than one community.…”

Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices

“…Inadequate, or the absence of, such policy guidelines is a major setback in most LMICs, and Africa. Development of databanks is also an evolving area with the rising scope, scale and complexity of emerging data and data sources ushering novel questions around ethical principles 10, 155,242,313,314 . Additionally, incoherence of national laws and regulations coupled with varying levels of adherence to laws does not always translate to moral use of data nor offer a guarantee for public trust 315 , hence the need for continuous development and oversight.…”

“…The Tikanga Framework of New Zealand, aimed at including Maori People in decisions regarding the use of their data, is an example of a flexible system that is responsive to the material circumstances of its target population 96 . Databanks may need to tailor-make their standard operating procedures to address the unique needs of specific groups 155 . It is important to ensure continuous and appropriate interaction with stakeholders.…”

“…A need to train researchers on data management, and the recruitment of dedicated support staff to document data and manage repositories 155,221,253 .…”