2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2022.101270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESR and OSL dating of fossil-bearing deposits from Naracoorte Cave Complex palaeontological sites, south Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) The relatively small aliquot sizes under consideration here (~360 grains per disc) should still permit some basic insights into any enhanced D e scatter related to significant bleaching complications, as has been demonstrated in several multigrain pIR‐IR studies using comparable D e measurement configurations (e.g. Arnold et al ., 2022; Priya et al ., 2022). (ii) The replicate single‐grain TT‐OSL results obtained in this study provide a semi‐independent means of examining any biasing multigrain averaging effects related to heterogeneous bleaching (see Discussion below).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) The relatively small aliquot sizes under consideration here (~360 grains per disc) should still permit some basic insights into any enhanced D e scatter related to significant bleaching complications, as has been demonstrated in several multigrain pIR‐IR studies using comparable D e measurement configurations (e.g. Arnold et al ., 2022; Priya et al ., 2022). (ii) The replicate single‐grain TT‐OSL results obtained in this study provide a semi‐independent means of examining any biasing multigrain averaging effects related to heterogeneous bleaching (see Discussion below).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, transportation of predominantly wellbleached, externally derived sediments through the closed cave system is likely to have resulted in the entrainment of grains from pre-existing cave floor sediments, and their subsequent translocation to deeper parts of the cavity along with the more recently bleached grain populations (e.g. Prideaux et al, 2010;Jankowski et al, 2016;Arnold et al, 2022;Priya et al, 2022). This interpretation is in keeping with the complex accumulation histories apparent for some of the layers from sedimentological and thin-section analyses; including Layer 2, a dry grain-flow deposit (Figures 6A, 6B), Layer 8, which represents an intruded fill that likely incorporated remobilised deposits originally preserved elsewhere in the cavity, Layer 10, which was deposited under sheet wash or standing water conditions (Figure 6F), and Layer 11, which includes re-transported cave pearls originating from upslope sources (Figure 7A).…”
Section: Optically Stimulated Luminescence Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%