2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2022.101301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining sediment infill dynamics at Naracoorte cave megafauna sites using multiple luminescence dating signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S7), and low overdispersion values of 26 ± 2% to 27 ± 2% (table S4). These overdispersion values are consistent with (i.e., within 2σ) those typically reported for well-bleached and undisturbed single-grain D e datasets [see, e.g., (34,37,38)] and they are comparable to, albeit slightly higher than, the 2σ overdispersion range obtained in the dose recovery tests for sample TAM19-1 (13 to 25%). Both D e datasets are considered to be normally distributed according to their weighted skewness scores (32,39).…”
Section: Chronostratigraphic Framework Of the Upper Paleolithic Unitssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…S7), and low overdispersion values of 26 ± 2% to 27 ± 2% (table S4). These overdispersion values are consistent with (i.e., within 2σ) those typically reported for well-bleached and undisturbed single-grain D e datasets [see, e.g., (34,37,38)] and they are comparable to, albeit slightly higher than, the 2σ overdispersion range obtained in the dose recovery tests for sample TAM19-1 (13 to 25%). Both D e datasets are considered to be normally distributed according to their weighted skewness scores (32,39).…”
Section: Chronostratigraphic Framework Of the Upper Paleolithic Unitssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The D e distribution also has a relatively low overdispersion value of 12 ± 3%, which is consistent with overdispersion values commonly reported for well-bleached and unmixed multi-grain pIR-IRSL D e datasets at 2σ (e.g. the average overdispersion of 8 ± 1% presented by Arnold et al, 2022). We have therefore used the weighted mean D e value (calculated using the central age model; Galbraith et al, 1999) to derive the burial dose estimate.…”
Section: Geochronologysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The earliest evidence of the species comes from Main Fossil Chamber, Victoria Fossil Cave (225 ka min. age) (Grün et al 2001;Arnold et al 2022), with a specimen found at a similar stratigraphic level to samples yielding dates of 478 ± 22 ka and 443 ± 32 ka (Grün et al 2001) Protemnodon mamkurra sp. nov. is known from middle and late Pleistocene deposits.…”
Section: Pleistocene Distributions (Fig 143)mentioning
confidence: 72%