2011
DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.103231rh
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escape mechanisms after antiangiogenic treatment, or why are the tumors growing again?

Abstract: �nhi�itors of angiogenesis an� ra�iation in�uce compensatory changes in the tumor �as� �nhi�itors of angiogenesis an� ra�iation in�uce compensatory changes in the tumor �as� culature �oth �uring an� after cessation of treatment. �n numerous preclinical stu�ies, angiogenesis inhi�itors were shown to �e efficient in the treatment of many pathological con�itions, inclu�ing soli� cancers. �n most clinical trials, howe�er, this approach turne� out to ha�e no significant effect, especially if applie� as monotherapy.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that targeting the VEGF pathway often induces 'angiogenic escape' by upregulating other angiogenic factors [34,35]. Therefore, we have measured expression levels of VEGF, as angiogenic escape of PlGF treatment is likely to act through this factor [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that targeting the VEGF pathway often induces 'angiogenic escape' by upregulating other angiogenic factors [34,35]. Therefore, we have measured expression levels of VEGF, as angiogenic escape of PlGF treatment is likely to act through this factor [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, IA, also called splitting angiogenesis or nonsprouting angiogenesis, was discovered in the late eighties of the 20th century and remains poorly investigated [10,11,41]. Nevertheless, IA seems to play a major role in the growth and remodeling of most vascular beds, including the vascular beds of tumors [12,42,43]. …”
Section: Intussusceptive Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that tumors respond with an angiogenic switch from SA to IA following ionizing radiation or antiangiogenic drug therapy using PTK787/ZK222584, a broad range tyrosine kinase inhibitor. These treatments are mainly designed to stop SA but lose their effect because the process of IA enables the vascular network to keep growing [12,43,60]. Consequently, future therapies will need to target both mechanisms of angiogenesis in order to be effective.…”
Section: Intussusceptive Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These agents when used in combination with radiation or other chemotherapeutic agents or both, enhances the tumor response to radiation and increases the overall survival rate of patients. When an antiangiogenic agent is applied alone, cancer cells might switch from angiogenic sprouting to intussuscepted mode [41] which eventually promotes a second wave of angiogenesis. [42] This angiogenic switch of the tumor vasculature makes it more resistant to antiangiogenic agents or radiation therapy since the vessels become mature, rigid, and less vulnerable to VEGF inhibition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%