“…19,22,27,[30][31][32]35 In addition to these scales, there are others that can be used in the evaluation of patients with spinal metastases, adding more detailed aspects and with a multidisciplinary view of the patient centered on functional capacity, functional independence/physical performance, on the presence of comorbidities, the quality of life and satisfaction, on the presence of depression and mood disorders, on functional activity to return to work, but, due to Brazilian sociocultural peculiarities, the results may not be fully applicable in their entirety. 19,25,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] Another aspect to be mentioned is that a decision centered only on prognostic scales can often produce inhuman situations for the patients and their families, characterizing for them a feeling of abandonment and discredit. In one study, patients who scored between 0 and 8 on the modified Tokuhashi scale and who normally would not have been operated on because of poor prognosis, underwent surgery and had a longer survival than expected from the score, showing the benefit of investing in patients with worse prognoses.…”