“…The data quality verification based on observation ( o ) minus model background ( b ) wind, o ‐ b , departures for the second reprocessed data set (2B11—Level 2 Baseline 11) at the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) shows that the global daily average biases are close to zero for both Rayleigh‐clear and Mie‐cloudy winds from June 2019 to October 2020 (Rennie & Isaksen, 2024). However, due to the unexpected signal loss of the Aeolus DWL after the launch (Straume‐Lindner et al., 2021), the estimated random errors determined by the variance of o ‐ b departures and the background error variance for Rayleigh‐clear winds suffered a gradual increase, rising from ∼5 to ∼7 m/s during the study period, which are more than 100% larger than the mission requirement, while Mie‐cloudy winds are rather insensitive to this instrument problem with stable random errors of ∼3.5 m/s (Ingmann & Straume, 2016; Rennie & Isaksen, 2024). The validations worldwide by comparing to wind observations show similar results for the products after baseline 10 with the M1‐temperature‐based bias correction and the daily update of bias removal (Aeolus Data Innovation and Science Cluster, 2020; Belova et al., 2021; Iwai et al., 2021; Ratynski et al., 2023; Witschas et al., 2022; Zuo et al., 2022).…”