2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS 2021
DOI: 10.1109/igarss47720.2021.9554007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESA'S Wind Mission Aeolus - Overview, Status and Outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the continually improved data processing chain, from Baseline 10 with M1-temperature-based bias correction and daily updates of global offset bias removal (Data Innovation and Science Cluster, 2020), the systematic errors of both Rayleigh-clear winds and Mie-cloudy winds are almost within 0.5 m s -1 despite some cases in the polar regions, and the random errors mainly vary between 4 m s -1 and 8 m s -1 for Rayleigh-clear winds and between 2.0 m s -1 and 5 m s -1 for Mie-cloudy winds (Belova et al, 2021;Iwai et al, 2021;Witschas et al, 2022;Zuo et al, 2022). However, what should be noted is that Aeolus has been suffering unexpected signal loss since the launch, probably due to the decreasing emitted laser energy for the FM-A period (August 2018 -June 2019) and/or laser-induced contamination for the FM-B period (July 2019 -September 2022) (Straume-Lindner et al, 2021). The data quality assessment based on the second reprocessed data set (2B11) by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) revealed that the estimated random error of Rayleighclear wind increased by 40% from ~5 m s -1 to ~7 m s -1 during July 2019 -October 2020 due to the gradual signal reduction of DWL, while this instrument issue has less influence on Mie-cloudy winds with estimated random errors remaining at ~3.5 m s -1 (Rennie and Isaksen, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the continually improved data processing chain, from Baseline 10 with M1-temperature-based bias correction and daily updates of global offset bias removal (Data Innovation and Science Cluster, 2020), the systematic errors of both Rayleigh-clear winds and Mie-cloudy winds are almost within 0.5 m s -1 despite some cases in the polar regions, and the random errors mainly vary between 4 m s -1 and 8 m s -1 for Rayleigh-clear winds and between 2.0 m s -1 and 5 m s -1 for Mie-cloudy winds (Belova et al, 2021;Iwai et al, 2021;Witschas et al, 2022;Zuo et al, 2022). However, what should be noted is that Aeolus has been suffering unexpected signal loss since the launch, probably due to the decreasing emitted laser energy for the FM-A period (August 2018 -June 2019) and/or laser-induced contamination for the FM-B period (July 2019 -September 2022) (Straume-Lindner et al, 2021). The data quality assessment based on the second reprocessed data set (2B11) by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) revealed that the estimated random error of Rayleighclear wind increased by 40% from ~5 m s -1 to ~7 m s -1 during July 2019 -October 2020 due to the gradual signal reduction of DWL, while this instrument issue has less influence on Mie-cloudy winds with estimated random errors remaining at ~3.5 m s -1 (Rennie and Isaksen, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the major deficiencies in the Global Observing System is the lack of distributed wind profile measurements, especially over the oceans, in the tropics and the Southern Hemisphere (Stoffelen et al., 2020; World Meteorological Organization, 2020). To begin to fill this gap, in August 2018, the European Space Agency (ESA) launched the Aeolus satellite that carried a direct‐detection Doppler Wind Lidar (DWL) and was able to characterize global wind profiles from near the surface to about 30 km in height (Straume‐Lindner et al., 2021). The satellite followed a sun‐synchronous polar orbit with the descending node at 06:00 local time (LT) and the ascending node at 18:00 LT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data quality verification based on observation ( o ) minus model background ( b ) wind, o ‐ b , departures for the second reprocessed data set (2B11—Level 2 Baseline 11) at the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) shows that the global daily average biases are close to zero for both Rayleigh‐clear and Mie‐cloudy winds from June 2019 to October 2020 (Rennie & Isaksen, 2024). However, due to the unexpected signal loss of the Aeolus DWL after the launch (Straume‐Lindner et al., 2021), the estimated random errors determined by the variance of o ‐ b departures and the background error variance for Rayleigh‐clear winds suffered a gradual increase, rising from ∼5 to ∼7 m/s during the study period, which are more than 100% larger than the mission requirement, while Mie‐cloudy winds are rather insensitive to this instrument problem with stable random errors of ∼3.5 m/s (Ingmann & Straume, 2016; Rennie & Isaksen, 2024). The validations worldwide by comparing to wind observations show similar results for the products after baseline 10 with the M1‐temperature‐based bias correction and the daily update of bias removal (Aeolus Data Innovation and Science Cluster, 2020; Belova et al., 2021; Iwai et al., 2021; Ratynski et al., 2023; Witschas et al., 2022; Zuo et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This need motivated the Aeolus mission of the European Space Agency, carrying the first high-spectral-resolution Doppler lidar (HSRL) placed in space, dedicated for wind profile measurements 28 , 29 . Launched in August 2018, Aeolus acquires profiles of the wind on a global scale, filling vast observation gaps particularly over the oceans, poles, tropics, and the Southern Hemisphere, providing homogeneous wind profiling observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%