Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1186/cc10819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in the arterial blood pressure measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two prospective observational studies assessing accuracy of invasive arterial pressure monitoring, using disposable blood pressure transducers, observed 30% and 80% of overdamping, respectively. This is especially important in the human field as the clinicians use systolic blood pressure as the main blood pressure value 4 21. Given these faults seen in the human literature and what was observed in these cases, there is potential for error in invasive blood pressure monitoring both in overestimating and underestimating blood pressure readings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two prospective observational studies assessing accuracy of invasive arterial pressure monitoring, using disposable blood pressure transducers, observed 30% and 80% of overdamping, respectively. This is especially important in the human field as the clinicians use systolic blood pressure as the main blood pressure value 4 21. Given these faults seen in the human literature and what was observed in these cases, there is potential for error in invasive blood pressure monitoring both in overestimating and underestimating blood pressure readings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%