Altre Modernità 2017
DOI: 10.13130/2035-7680/8304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors and Learning/Teaching English as a Second/Foreign Language: an Exercise in Grammaticology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the outcome element, there were still many students who sometimes even never get motivated after learning grammar materials and feel enthusiasm for the next materials (Meguro, 2019;Muter & Snowling, 1997). Ideally for learning fundamental grammar, students were expected to have basic knowledge of grammar in English (Sanz, 1997;Soares et al, 2021), be able to apply the knowledge and understanding of grammar in the use of good English sentences (Deibel, 2020), and identify basic grammatical errors in sentences based on the syllabus (Nava, 2017). However, in reality, based on the analysis of input, process, output, and outcome, students had not been able to achieve the learning achievement and it was not implemented properly so the results were poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the outcome element, there were still many students who sometimes even never get motivated after learning grammar materials and feel enthusiasm for the next materials (Meguro, 2019;Muter & Snowling, 1997). Ideally for learning fundamental grammar, students were expected to have basic knowledge of grammar in English (Sanz, 1997;Soares et al, 2021), be able to apply the knowledge and understanding of grammar in the use of good English sentences (Deibel, 2020), and identify basic grammatical errors in sentences based on the syllabus (Nava, 2017). However, in reality, based on the analysis of input, process, output, and outcome, students had not been able to achieve the learning achievement and it was not implemented properly so the results were poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%