Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Interactive Multimedia on Mobile and Portable Devices 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2390821.2390826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error-tolerant interactive image segmentation using dynamic and iterated graph-cuts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…APP is the similarity measure proposed An and Pellacini [AP08] used with the same dense CRF as our approach. SEN is the method of Setter et al [ŞUA12]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…APP is the similarity measure proposed An and Pellacini [AP08] used with the same dense CRF as our approach. SEN is the method of Setter et al [ŞUA12]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Şener et al [ŞUA12] proposes an error correction procedure and combines this with a dynamic and iterative graph‐cut algorithm for interactive segmentation. Superpixels that do not conform to a dynamically‐learned single Gaussian color model are removed from the graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we augment the interaction with the user by superimposing over the processed image both the segmentation mask generated by GrabCut and the set of SLIC [21] superpixels computed over the image itself. The user can "tap" those superpixels to decide whether they should be added or removed from the initial segmentation mask; this is similar but opposite to [16], where the interactive segmentation process directly starts from superpixels.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While recent advancements in this field have pushed the accuracies of fully automatic techniques for solving this task much further than they were a few years ago [2], [3], in professional image editing it is still not possible to adopt fully automatic algorithms to select object boundaries as their current state-of-the-art results do not reach the minimum standard of accuracy demanded by professional image editors. For this reason, several interactive segmentation algorithms, mostly based on graph cut segmentation techniques, have been proposed over the last decade [4]- [16]. Among those, some can be guided by the users throughout the segmentation process in order to correct their errors, which often appear when the contrast between the object that needs to be selected and the background is extremely low or when the boundary of the object is highly jagged, with the aim of reaching final segmentation results that meet the desired degree of accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation