2012 IEEE 9th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS 2012) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/mass.2012.6502530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error minimizing jammer localization through smart estimation of ambient noise

Abstract: Abstract-Jammer can jeopardize the dependability of wireless networks, and jammer's position information allows the network to cope with jamming leveraging varieties of defense strategies. Thus, in this paper, we address the problem of localizing jammer. Prior work relies on indirect measurements derived from jamming effects, which makes it difficult to accurately localize jammer. We localize jammer by directly using the strength of jamming signals (JSS). Estimating JSS is challenging as they may be embedded i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the jamming power cannot be derived or estimated directly. In order to solve this problem, the jamming power is assumed to be chosen from a series of discrete values, which is also the assumption made in [24]. The proposed localization algorithm will be conducted under these discrete jamming powers and the best position and optimal value under each jamming power will be recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the jamming power cannot be derived or estimated directly. In order to solve this problem, the jamming power is assumed to be chosen from a series of discrete values, which is also the assumption made in [24]. The proposed localization algorithm will be conducted under these discrete jamming powers and the best position and optimal value under each jamming power will be recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of physical layer jammers is done via hardware-assisted approaches and statistical indices methods. In [3], [7], the affected nodes detect the constant jammer by sensing the strength of the jamming signal (JSS). They also report their measurements to a designated node in wireless networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding z 3 2 to both sides of the inequality in (22), and rearranging the terms, the following distance relation is achieved: Point z2 is the projection of z1 onto H.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding z 3 2 to both sides of the inequality in (22), and rearranging the terms, the following distance relation is achieved: for all z 3 ∈ H. Hence, for any point z 1 outside H, its projection onto H, denoted by z 2 , is closer to any point z 3 on H. Therefore, the optimal jammer location cannot be outside the convex hull H formed by the locations of the target nodes as the CRLB for each target node is inversely proportional to the distance between the jammer and the target nodes.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%