2012
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2012.13831abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Management Culture, Organizational Ambidexterity, and Firm Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different mechanisms can act as the backdrop here. For example, Rosenbusch et al (2014) approach this query from an organizational learning perspective and generate supportive results such that error management provides a balance between exploration and exploitation. Moreover, Rybowiak et al (1999: 543) find that, at the individual level, learning from errors relates to self-efficacy, qualification, long-term planning orientation, need for achievement, readiness to change, and initiative-taking, i.e., competencies that are relevant with exploring and exploiting actions (Zacher et al, 2016).…”
Section: Ambidextrous Leadership As the Mediating Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different mechanisms can act as the backdrop here. For example, Rosenbusch et al (2014) approach this query from an organizational learning perspective and generate supportive results such that error management provides a balance between exploration and exploitation. Moreover, Rybowiak et al (1999: 543) find that, at the individual level, learning from errors relates to self-efficacy, qualification, long-term planning orientation, need for achievement, readiness to change, and initiative-taking, i.e., competencies that are relevant with exploring and exploiting actions (Zacher et al, 2016).…”
Section: Ambidextrous Leadership As the Mediating Processmentioning
confidence: 99%