2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error analysis of finite element method for Poisson–Nernst–Planck equations

Abstract: In this paper we study the a priori error estimates of finite element method for the system of time-dependent Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations, and for the first time, we obtain its optimal error estimates in L ∞ (H 1) and L 2 (H 1) norms, and suboptimal error estimates in L ∞ (L 2) norm, with linear element, and optimal error estimates in L ∞ (L 2) norm with quadratic or higher-order element, for both semi-and fully discrete finite element approximations. Numerical experiments are also given to validate the th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, in our case for PNP system, the very interesting fact is that, to obtain the optimal convergence rate for both electrostatic potential and ionic concentrations, what we only need is the suboptimal convergence rate for the electric current field (see our error analysis in Section III). Thus, the Taylor‐Hood element with additional stabilization overcomes the previous difficulty occurring to the standard finite element method for PNP equations , and produces optimal convergence rates for all variables. In addition, as the mixed Taylor‐Hood approximation is naturally stable for Stokes/Navier‐Stokes equations, it implies that the mixed Taylor‐Hood approximation method shall be the most natural way to deal with the coupled system of PNP and Navier‐Stokes equations, which is actually a popular model of electrohydrodynamic problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, in our case for PNP system, the very interesting fact is that, to obtain the optimal convergence rate for both electrostatic potential and ionic concentrations, what we only need is the suboptimal convergence rate for the electric current field (see our error analysis in Section III). Thus, the Taylor‐Hood element with additional stabilization overcomes the previous difficulty occurring to the standard finite element method for PNP equations , and produces optimal convergence rates for all variables. In addition, as the mixed Taylor‐Hood approximation is naturally stable for Stokes/Navier‐Stokes equations, it implies that the mixed Taylor‐Hood approximation method shall be the most natural way to deal with the coupled system of PNP and Navier‐Stokes equations, which is actually a popular model of electrohydrodynamic problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their numerical analyses are either unavailable or incomplete. As a matter of fact, when the standard linear finite element method is applied to PNP equations, its error analysis is nontrivial, and its convergence rate in L 2 norm is only first order (suboptimal) in terms of the mesh size, which has been recently proved for the time‐dependent PNP equations in , where, an optimal convergence rate in H 1 norm but suboptimal convergence rate in L 2 norm are obtained for both the ionic concentrations and the electrostatic potential when the standard linear finite element method is used. To improve the convergence rate in L 2 norm from suboptimal to optimal when the linear finite element is used for both ionic concentrations and electrostatic potential as shown in , we propose the mixed finite element method in this article to discretize the electrostatic potential equation, where, if the Taylor‐Hood‐type P2P1 element is used, the electrostatic potential is still approximated by the linear element, while its gradient, termed as the electric field, is approximated by the quadratic element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we focus on the superconvergence analysis of bilinear finite element method (FEM) for the nonlinear Planck–Nernst–Poisson (PNP) equations , which describes the mass concentration of particles p1,p2:0T0+ and the electrostatic potential ψ : (0, T ] → ℝ, satisfying leftp1t·p1+p1ψ=F1,XtΩ×J,p2t·p2p2ψ=F2,XtΩ×J,Δψp1+p2=F3,XtΩ×J, where Ω ⊂ ℝ 2 is a rectangular domain with its boundary ∂Ω , X=xy,J=0T,pitalicit=piti=12 and F i ( i = 1, 2, 3) are the reaction terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let p10p20ψ0 be the initial concentrations and potential. We employ the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions as in , that is, p1=p2=ψ=0,Xt∂Ω×J. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate B 2 , similar to the technique used in [28] (see (4.20) on p. 35), we give the following induction hypothesis and prove it by mathematical induction.…”
Section: Lemma 1 Assume That Umentioning
confidence: 99%