Erratum to “Intermittent treatment of knee osteoarthritis with oral chondroitin sulfate: a one-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study versus placebo” [Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12 (2004) 269–276]
Abstract:The publisher regrets that in the above article the fourth author's name was spelt incorrectly. It is now represented correctly above as Florent de Vathaire.
“…Only a few medications have been recognized by clinical trials as potentially influencing the course of OA beneficially. These include chondroitin sulfate (CS), [4][5][6][7] glucosamine, [8][9][10] diacerein, 11) doxycycline (an antibiotic belonging to the tetracycline family), 12) cyclooxygenase/5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, 13) and intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA). These approaches, however, have frequently produced insufficient benefit and excess risk of adverse effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27] Furthermore, the clinical efficacy of CS has been shown in improving OA joint function and in reducing cartilage destruction. [4][5][6][7][28][29][30] Singh et al recently conducted a review of randomized trials of OA interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews and concluded that CS may improve pain, that it probably improves QOL, and that it probably slows down narrowing of the joint space in patients with knee OA. 31) However, there have also been reports showing no effects of CS on pain or cartilage structure.…”
We explored the effects of chondroitin sulfate on knee osteoarthritis in a one-year, randomized, doubleblind, dose-comparison study. Patients with painful, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3, osteoarthritis of the knee were treated with oral chondroitin sulfate at a dose of either 260 mg/d (low-dose group, control group) or 1560 mg/d (high-dose group). Symptoms were evaluated by the Lequesne's index and visual analog scale for pain. We made subgroup analyses according to background symptom severity (Lequesne's index ≥8 or <8) in 73 patients. Serum level of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and hyaluronic acid were also determined. In the subgroup with severe symptoms (Lequesne's index ≥8), the chondroitin sulfate dose of 1560 mg/d improved pain faster after 6 and 9 months' therapy. However, no dose-related effects were found on cartilage oligomeric matrix protein or hyaluronic acid levels. Chondroitin sulfate also had good tolerability. We conclude that chondroitin sulfate is useful for pain control in knee osteoarthritis.Key words chondroitin sulfate; pain-management; clinical trial; randomized controlled trial Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and is a major cause of morbidity, activity limitation, physical disability, excess health care utilization, and reduced healthrelated QOL, especially in people aged 65 years and older.
“…Only a few medications have been recognized by clinical trials as potentially influencing the course of OA beneficially. These include chondroitin sulfate (CS), [4][5][6][7] glucosamine, [8][9][10] diacerein, 11) doxycycline (an antibiotic belonging to the tetracycline family), 12) cyclooxygenase/5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, 13) and intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA). These approaches, however, have frequently produced insufficient benefit and excess risk of adverse effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27] Furthermore, the clinical efficacy of CS has been shown in improving OA joint function and in reducing cartilage destruction. [4][5][6][7][28][29][30] Singh et al recently conducted a review of randomized trials of OA interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews and concluded that CS may improve pain, that it probably improves QOL, and that it probably slows down narrowing of the joint space in patients with knee OA. 31) However, there have also been reports showing no effects of CS on pain or cartilage structure.…”
We explored the effects of chondroitin sulfate on knee osteoarthritis in a one-year, randomized, doubleblind, dose-comparison study. Patients with painful, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3, osteoarthritis of the knee were treated with oral chondroitin sulfate at a dose of either 260 mg/d (low-dose group, control group) or 1560 mg/d (high-dose group). Symptoms were evaluated by the Lequesne's index and visual analog scale for pain. We made subgroup analyses according to background symptom severity (Lequesne's index ≥8 or <8) in 73 patients. Serum level of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and hyaluronic acid were also determined. In the subgroup with severe symptoms (Lequesne's index ≥8), the chondroitin sulfate dose of 1560 mg/d improved pain faster after 6 and 9 months' therapy. However, no dose-related effects were found on cartilage oligomeric matrix protein or hyaluronic acid levels. Chondroitin sulfate also had good tolerability. We conclude that chondroitin sulfate is useful for pain control in knee osteoarthritis.Key words chondroitin sulfate; pain-management; clinical trial; randomized controlled trial Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and is a major cause of morbidity, activity limitation, physical disability, excess health care utilization, and reduced healthrelated QOL, especially in people aged 65 years and older.
“…ХС и глюкозамин с позиций доказательной медицины среди хондропротекторных средств имеют высшую сте-пень доказательности и достоверности результатов -категорию А, в связи с чем на их основе сегодня и произ-водят большинство хондропротекторов, применяющихся в мировой практике [23][24][25][26][27][28]. Поэтому применение глюко-замина и хондроитина сульфата является патогенетиче-ски обоснованным.…”
“…Hyperuricemia leads to urate crystal formation and deposition in the joints thus initiating inflammatory response by triggering proinflammatory mediator production, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (Ferrari et al, 2016;Inokuchi et al, 2008;Choi et al, 2005). Medication prescribed to treat gout includes urate lowering agents and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) but these agents are associated with intolerances or adverse effects (Busso and So, 2010;Khanna et al, 2012;Liu-Bryan and Lioté, 2005;Umamaheswari et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2008;Wortman et al, 2010). Thus, the development of novel natural agents with therapeutic potential against gout would provide great clinical significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these compounds have become increasingly popular for treatment of arthritis as both are safe and have no adverse effect (Uebelhart et al, 2004;Lovu et al, 2008;Volpi, 2009;Nagaoka, 2014). In our previous research, CS and glucosamine had been succesfully extracted from chicken feet cartilage using aqueous method.…”
Gout is a form of inflammatory arthritis caused by the deposition of uric acid. The therapeutic approach to gout is mainly divided by the treatment of inflammation and the management of serum urate level. This study aim to investigate whether chondroitin sulfate (CS) and glucosamine in chicken feet cartilage powder (CFE) and aqueous extract (AE) are able to decrease serum urate level and inflammation in animal model of gouty arthritis. CFE and AE were evaluated in vitro for xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibition. The anti-hyperuricemic activity and liver XO inhibition were evaluated in vivo on oxonate-induced hyperuricemia rats. Anti-inflammatory property was also determined on monosodium urate (MSU) crystal-induced paw edema model. CFE and AE supplementation showed urate-lowering activity. However, both treatments were not able to inhibit in vitro and in vivo XO activity. In MSU crystal-induced mice, the levels of paw swelling and lipid peroxidation were increased; in addition, a decrease in the activities of SOD and changes in the expression of CD11b + TNF-α and CD11b + IL-6 of the spleen were demonstrated. These changes were reverted to near normal levels upon CFE and AE treatments. These results suggest that CS and glucosamine from CFE and AE show a potent therapeutic effect against gouty arthritis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.