2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-011-0321-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: Fluorescence spectroscopy as a potential metabonomic tool for early detection of colorectal cancer

Abstract: The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. In the Materials and methods section the number of samples ready for data analysis is incorrectly given as 301, 295 and 300 for the three groups. The correct numbers are 299, 299 and 289. The incorrect numbers come from an intermediate step in the analysis where some irrelevant standard samples were included. Similar quality of results was obtained on datasets of the size incorrectly given in the paper. The data from the paper can be downl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, multidimensional fluorescence has been used to detect metabolites in biological samples to evaluate the quality of various animal products [9][10][11][12]. Multidimensional fluorescence is comprehensive, has a high sensitivity, and requires minimal sample preparation steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, multidimensional fluorescence has been used to detect metabolites in biological samples to evaluate the quality of various animal products [9][10][11][12]. Multidimensional fluorescence is comprehensive, has a high sensitivity, and requires minimal sample preparation steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier paper, we have proposed measurements of autofluorescence of human blood plasma as a potential useful tool for detecting colorectal cancer (Lawaetz et al 2012a, b). The idea behind this approach was based on earlier findings by Leiner et al amongst others (Leiner et al 1983, 1986a; Nørgaard et al 2005; Wolfbeis and Leiner 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%