2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0682-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: Development, Validation, and Application of a Parametric Pediatric Head Finite Element Model for Impact Simulations

Abstract: This erratum is to correct for a gantry tilt effect that was not considered in the CT image processing in the original publication. Figures 3-8, 10-12, and Table 2 have been updated to reflect the geometry changes of the pediatric heads in both the CT segmentation results and the parametric FE model. The p-values of material and geometry factors in the parametric study in Fig. 6 changed slightly from the original publication, but these changes did not affect statistical significance. After correction, on avera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age effects on the skull material properties within 0-9 MO age group cannot be well established. Compared to other components of the pediatric head, skull material property was found to have much more significant effect on global and strain/stress responses than the brain material [23,24]. Test data on the material properties of pediatric brain are very scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Age effects on the skull material properties within 0-9 MO age group cannot be well established. Compared to other components of the pediatric head, skull material property was found to have much more significant effect on global and strain/stress responses than the brain material [23,24]. Test data on the material properties of pediatric brain are very scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…During the mesh morphing, head shape, size, and skull thickness were morphed according to model-predicted landmark locations and the skull thickness values at those locations for children with different ages and head circumferences. In this study, the material properties for different head components were assigned based on a previous study by Li et al [23][24][25] as listed in Table 1. The linear elastic model was used for the skull with a Young's modulus of 164.3 MPa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was also used to reproduce Weber's cadaver drop tests [15], [16] that focus on bone fracture. Li et al [17], [18] developed a parametric paediatric head FEM and morphed a baseline model to a newborn size, a 1.5MO, and a 3MO head model, in which only the newborn head FEM was validated against cadaver experiment. Weber [15], [16] dropped 50 children aged from 0 to 9MO onto 5 different impact surfaces under the drop height of 82cm, which provided important information for studying the skull fracture mechanism and injury criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coats et al [12] developed a 1.5MO head FE model and conducted a parametric study to investigate the relative importance of brain material properties and the anatomical variations in suture and scalp on head responses under drop conditions. This model was also used to reproduce Weber's cadaver drop tests [13,14] that focus on bone fracture Liet al [15,16] developed a parametric pediatric head FE model and morphed a baseline model to a newborn, a 1.5MO, and a 3MO head model, in which only the newborn head FE model was validated against cadaver experiment. Weber [13,14] dropped 50 children aged from 0 to 9 month old onto 5 different impact surfaces under the drop height of 82 cm, which provided important information for studying the skull fracture mechanism and injury criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest research about development and validation of the infant head finite element model was conducted by Zigang Li et al in 2013. From the research done by Zigang et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%