2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/586537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “A Proposed New Index for Clinical Evaluation of Interproximal Soft Tissues: The Interdental Pressure Index”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure applied by a horizontal brush in the interdental area should be firm and continuous until reaching maximum compression with minimal discomfort to the patient. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to estimate the correlation between the patient's discomfort perception and the interproximal pressure (0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain) . The pressure used to place the IDB was approximately 50–100 N cm −2 (0.20–0.40 gram‐force), and 80% of participants were assigned a VAS score of ≤1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pressure applied by a horizontal brush in the interdental area should be firm and continuous until reaching maximum compression with minimal discomfort to the patient. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to estimate the correlation between the patient's discomfort perception and the interproximal pressure (0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain) . The pressure used to place the IDB was approximately 50–100 N cm −2 (0.20–0.40 gram‐force), and 80% of participants were assigned a VAS score of ≤1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These examiners were trained in the use of the CPS Curaprox IDBs in a single cleaning movement, comprising three stages: (i) place an IDB at the point where the interdental gap begins, tilt the tip at an angle to the centreline of the teeth, and push it in gently at the correct angle as far as the centre of the teeth; (ii) without putting any more pressure on the brush, hold the handle at 90° to the teeth; and (iii) push the brush through with care and then pull it out. The VAS was used . Examiners were blinded to each other, and the two observations were collected at an interval of at least 15 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present paper, although we have tried to classify the papilla based on different indices to check the postoperative results, an index, called the interdental pressure index, could not be used as it required additional armamentarium and was discovered during the literature review after the procedures were carried out. The index takes into account the inflammatory status of the interdental papilla by evaluating the pressure applied by a modified dynamom-eter [38]. The number of cases in this report is too small to establish a proper guideline for selection of the best technique for papilla reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 4- and 5-year follow-up visits, clinical condition of the treated tooth appeared stable, with neither probing pocket depth (PPD) nor bleeding on probing, neither signs of inflammation nor tooth mobility, and slight buccal gingival recession and negative interdental pressure index [Figures 4 and 5 ]. [ 6 ]…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%