2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.86.069902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Relation between baryon number fluctuations and experimentally observed proton number fluctuations in relativistic heavy ion collisions [Phys. Rev. C86, 024904 (2012)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
164
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 [28]. It, however, should be remembered that the net-proton number is not a conserved charge and different from net-baryon number [98,99]. In fact, it is shown in Refs.…”
Section: Conserved Charges In Heavy Ion Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 [28]. It, however, should be remembered that the net-proton number is not a conserved charge and different from net-baryon number [98,99]. In fact, it is shown in Refs.…”
Section: Conserved Charges In Heavy Ion Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of this assumption is fulfilled at the LHC energies [23]. In order to correct net proton distributions for the baryon number conservation eq.…”
Section: Global Conservation Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the corresponding cumulants for particles can be obtained by replacing ∆N and ∆n in eqs. [21][22][23][24] with N B and n B , respectively. In the same way the cumulants for antiparticles are obtained.…”
Section: Participant or Volume Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include acceptance corrections [24,25], finite volume effects [26], volume fluctuations [27] as well as possible non-equilibrium effects.…”
Section: Fluctuations At µ B /T >mentioning
confidence: 99%