2011
DOI: 10.1038/nmat3147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: In vivo and in vitro tracking of erosion in biodegradable materials using non-invasive fluorescence imaging

Abstract: The design of erodible biomaterials relies on the ability to program the in vivo retention time, which necessitates real-time monitoring of erosion. However, in vivo performance cannot always be predicted by traditional determination of in vitro erosion 1,2 , and standard methods sacrifice samples or animals 3 , preventing sequential measures of the same specimen. We harnessed non-invasive fluorescence imaging to sequentially follow in vivo material-mass loss in order to model the degradation of materials hydr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of interactions between immune cells and ECM‐based scaffolds may provide important mechanistic insight, but translating these materials into the clinic ultimately requires analysis of response in vivo. Furthermore, local environments have a profound effect on cellular behavior, often causing discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo data . For example, pro‐healing effects of MDP hydrogels were observed in implant studies in vivo, which were unexpected based on in vitro observations of minimal enhancement of cell viability, adhesion, and morphology compared to MDPs engineered with ECM‐derived peptides .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of interactions between immune cells and ECM‐based scaffolds may provide important mechanistic insight, but translating these materials into the clinic ultimately requires analysis of response in vivo. Furthermore, local environments have a profound effect on cellular behavior, often causing discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo data . For example, pro‐healing effects of MDP hydrogels were observed in implant studies in vivo, which were unexpected based on in vitro observations of minimal enhancement of cell viability, adhesion, and morphology compared to MDPs engineered with ECM‐derived peptides .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%