Erratum: “Heat Capacity of Liquids. Critical Review and Recommended Values. Volumes I and II.” [J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Monograph No. 6 (1996)]

Abstract

The errata are arranged in the format shown below and are listed as found according to successive pages in the 1996 Monograph No.6. After the page number for specific erratum, there is information provided which indicates the location on the specific erratum on a given page, such as: number and name of table, reference squib, compound name or other pertinent information. If a given error occurs on more than one page, the page numbers are listed for occurrence of each error in a block of consecutive lines. Next, the erratum appears as it is found in the publication; thereafter one finds the correction. The last line offers a comment or explanation about the erratum.

High-pressure speed of sound, density and compressibility of heavy normal paraffins: C 28H58 and C 36H 74

“…The heat capacities of n-C 28 and n-C 36 at atmospheric pressure required as initial values in the second integral were taken from the compilation of Zabransky et al (18) and were expressed as a linear function of temperature as follows:…”

Isobaric heat capacities, densities, isentropic compressibilities and second-order excess derivatives for (1-propanol +n-decane)

“…The C p · V −1 data were obtained using a scanning method whose detailed description can be found elsewhere. (22) The calorimeter was calibrated with n-heptane and 1-butanol whose heat capacities are well known and taken from Zabransky et al (23) The precision of the C p,m measurements was estimated to be about ±0.03 (2) •, T = 280.15 K; , T = 288.15 K; , T = 298.15 K; , T = 308.15 K; +, 318.15 K.…”

Excess properties for binary systems ionic liquid+ethanol: Experimental results and theoretical description using the ERAS model

“…This magnitude was measured in a Setaram MicroDSCIII differential scanning calorimeter. n-Butanol and toluene were used as C p V −1 standards, and their densities and molar heat capacities were obtained from the literature [40][41][42][43]. The uncertainty of the measurements is estimated to be 0.3%.…”