2020
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.13032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratic noise suppression using iterative structure‐oriented space‐varying median filtering with sparsity constraint

Abstract: Erratic noise often has high amplitudes and a non-Gaussian distribution. Leastsquares-based approaches therefore are not optimal. This can be handled better with non-least-squares approaches, for example based on Huber norm which is computationally expensive. An alternative method has been published which involves transforming the data with erratic noise to pseudodata that have Gaussian distributed noise. It can then be attenuated using traditional least-squares approaches. This alternative method has previous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution based on the L2‐norm misfit function is unstable, where a large number of outliers are introduced with much signal loss, and the difference between calculated and numerically secondary sources is noticeable. Figure 2d–f shows the deblended primary, secondary sources and estimation errors using the iterative structure‐oriented space‐varying median filtering (SOSVMF) (Huang et al., 2021); the separation effect is good, accompanied by edge loss.…”
Section: Synthetic Data Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution based on the L2‐norm misfit function is unstable, where a large number of outliers are introduced with much signal loss, and the difference between calculated and numerically secondary sources is noticeable. Figure 2d–f shows the deblended primary, secondary sources and estimation errors using the iterative structure‐oriented space‐varying median filtering (SOSVMF) (Huang et al., 2021); the separation effect is good, accompanied by edge loss.…”
Section: Synthetic Data Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional denoising methods include spatial domain denoising methods [1] and transform domain denoising methods [7], which mostly appear in the early stages. For example, Donoho and John Stone [30] proposed a wavelet threshold denoising method; Huang et al proposed that the median filtering method was the most widely used method [31]; Saito et al [32] designed and used the LMMSE filter to improve the denoising effect by restoring image texture; and the antileakage least-squares spectral analysis proposed by Ghaderpour [33] used the Fourier transform and least squares spectral analysis to process noise in seismic data. However, traditional denoising methods often face issues such as a high complexity and poor robustness.…”
Section: Image Denoising Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical or degraded audio recordings can benefit from time-domain filtering algorithms that aim to restore missing or damaged portions of the signal. Students can learn how to use techniques like interpolation, transient detection, or noise reduction to improve the fidelity and intelligibility of archival recordings, enabling them to study and appreciate musical works from the past [12]. Additionally, timedomain filtering techniques are utilized in audio analysis and transcription.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%