ERPs correlates of EEG relative beta training in ADHD children

Kropotov, J.D.; Grin-Yatsenko, Vera A.; Пономарев, В. А.; Чутко, Л. С.; Yakovenko, E. A.; Is, Nikishena

doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.05.011

Cited by 132 publications

(103 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(36 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…No significant group by time interaction was found, but good NF performers had less pronounced CNV reduction [62]. A significant increase of positive ERPs components over frontal-central areas within the 180-420 ms latency range, possibly reflecting an activation of frontal cortical areas associated with 20 sessions of beta NF training, was found in another study using a Go/No-Go task for good, but not for bad performers [63]. Parents' attitudes in regard to children have also been found to predict treatment response to NF.…”

Section: Which Adhd Subtypes Benefit From Nf?mentioning

confidence: 81%

Evidence-Based Information on the Clinical Use of Neurofeedback for ADHD

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Neurofeedback (NF) is a training to enhance selfregulatory capacity over brain activity patterns and consequently over brain mental states. Recent findings suggest that NF is a promising alternative for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We comprehensively reviewed literature searching for studies on the effectiveness and specificity of NF for the treatment of ADHD. In addition, clinically informative evidence-based data are discussed. We found 3 systematic review on the use of NF for ADHD and 6 randomized controlled trials that have not been included in these reviews. Most nonrandomized controlled trials found positive results with medium-to-large effect sizes, but the evidence for effectiveness are less robust when only randomized controlled studies are considered. The direct comparison of NF and sham-NF in 3 published studies have found no group differences, nevertheless methodological caveats, such as the quality of the training protocol used, sample size, and sample selection may have contributed to the negative results. Further data on specificity comes from electrophysiological studies reporting that NF effectively changes brain activity patterns. No safety issues have emerged from clinical trials and NF seems to be well tolerated and accepted. Follow-up studies support long-term effects of NF. Currently there is no available data to guide clinicians on the predictors of response to NF and on optimal treatment protocol. In conclusion, NF is a valid option for the treatment for ADHD, but further evidence is required to guide its use.

show abstract

Section: Which Adhd Subtypes Benefit From Nf?mentioning

confidence: 81%

Evidence-Based Information on the Clinical Use of Neurofeedback for ADHD

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nogo-P3, but no changes in earlier ERP components, in patients with good compared to bad training outcomes (Kropotov et al, 2005). Along with behavioural improvements, a non-specific increase in N1 and a specific increase in N2 for those in a variable-difficulty training condition have been reported following combined working memory and impulse-control training in children with AD/HDcom, taken to indicate improved early attention and inhibition processing (Johnstone et al, 2010a).…”

Section: Neurofeedback Training Of Relative Beta Eeg Activity Has Beementioning

confidence: 95%

Ten years on: A follow-up review of ERP research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Johnstone

Barry

Clarke

2013

Clinical Neurophysiology

144

132

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reviews the event-related potential (ERP) literature in relation to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) over the years [2002][2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012]. ERP studies exploring various aspects of brain functioning in children and adolescents with AD/HD are reviewed, with a focus on group effects and interpretations in the domains of attention, inhibitory control, performance monitoring, non-pharmacological treatments, and ERP/energetics interactions. There has been a distinct shift in research intensity over the past 10 years, with a large increase in ERP studies conducted in the areas of inhibitory control and performance monitoring. Overall, the research has identified a substantial number of ERP correlates of AD/HD. Robust differences from healthy controls have been reported in early orienting, inhibitory control, and error-processing components. These data offer potential to improve our understanding of the specific brain dysfunction(s) which contribute to the disorder. The literature would benefit from a more rigorous approach to clinical group composition and consideration of age effects, as well as increased emphasis on replication and extension studies using exacting participant, task, and analysis parameters. • Research focus and intensity has been in the domains of attention, inhibitory control, performance monitoring, non-pharmacological treatments, and ERP/energetics interactions.• Some consistent differences from healthy controls are emerging, but more emphasis on replication and extension studies is needed to increase the consistency and specificity of results. AbstractThis article reviews the event-related potential (ERP) literature in relation to attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) over the years 2002 to 2012. ERP studies exploring various aspects of brain functioning in children and adolescents with AD/HD are examined, with a focus on group effects and interpretations in the domains of attention, inhibitory control, performance monitoring, non-pharmacological treatments, and ERP/energetics interactions. There has been a distinct shift in research intensity over the past 10 years, with a large increase in ERP studies conducted in the areas of inhibitory control and performance monitoring. Overall, the research has identified a substantial number of ERP correlates of AD/HD. Robust differences from healthy controls have been reported in early orienting, inhibitory control, and error-processing components.These data offer potential to improve our understanding of the specific brain dysfunction(s) which contribute to the disorder. The literature would benefit from a more rigorous approach to clinical group composition and consideration of age effects, as well as increased emphasis on replication and extension studies using exacting participant, task, and analysis parameters.

show abstract

“…EEG-nf alters objective measures in brain activity EEG-nf can alter both electrical (Engelbregt et al, 2016;Kropotov et al, 2005;Strehl, Leins, et al, 200box 16) and hemodynamic Lévesque et al, 2006) The theoretical underpinnings at the core of EEG-nf seem dubious (Beyerstein, 1990;Kline, Brann, & Loney, 2002). Based on research findings correlating clinical conditions with quantitative differences in electrical brain activity, most neurofeedback protocols aim to increase or decrease a select bandwidth of neural oscillations (Thibault et al, 2015).…”

Section: Animals Respond To Eeg-nf But Do Not Respond To Placebosmentioning

confidence: 99%

The psychology of neurofeedback: Clinical intervention even if applied placebo.

Thibault

Raz

2017

American Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Advocates of neurofeedback make bold claims concerning brain regulation, treatment of disorders, and mental health. Decades of research and thousands of peer-reviewed publications support neurofeedback using electroencephalography (EEG-nf); yet, few experiments isolate the act of receiving feedback from a specific brain signal as a necessary precursor to obtain the purported benefits. Moreover, while psychosocial parameters including participant motivation and expectation, rather than neurobiological substrates, seem to fuel clinical improvement across a wide range of disorders, for-profit clinics continue to sprout across North America and Europe. Here, we highlight the tenuous evidence supporting EEG-nf and sketch out the weaknesses of this approach. We challenge classic arguments often articulated by proponents of EEG-nf and underscore how psychologists and mental health professionals stand to benefit from studying the ubiquitous placebo influences that likely drive these treatment outcomes.

show abstract

ERPs correlates of EEG relative beta training in ADHD children

Cited by 132 publications

References 34 publications

Evidence-Based Information on the Clinical Use of Neurofeedback for ADHD

Evidence-Based Information on the Clinical Use of Neurofeedback for ADHD

Ten years on: A follow-up review of ERP research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

The psychology of neurofeedback: Clinical intervention even if applied placebo.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About