Encyclopedia of Sexuality and Gender 2020

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59531-3_65-1

|View full text |Cite

|

Sign up to set email alerts

|

Erotic Fan Fiction

¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Sexual Interaction With Digital Technologies1

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

0

Mentioning

1

Contrasting

0

Unclassified

1

Year Published

2021

2021

2023

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite2

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

0

Mentioning

1

Contrasting

0

Unclassified

1

Order By: Relevance

“…Traditional digital pornography comes in a variety of media forms. The literature differentiates between text-based (e.g., erotic fan fiction; Floegel, 2020 ; Döring, 2021 ), audio-based (e.g., adult phone line recordings; Glascock and LaRose, 1993 ), image-based and computer-generated (e.g., erotic manga and anime; Vučurović, 2016 ; Baudinette, 2017 ; erotic gifs; Hester et al, 2015 ; GGI porn; Saunders, 2019 ) and/or video-based digital pornographic content (e.g., cyberporn; Ashton et al, 2019 ). Research on traditional digital pornography mostly focuses on video-based or 2-dimensional (2D) audiovisual digital pornography.…”

Section: Sexual Interaction With Digital Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sexual Interaction in Digital Contexts and Its Implications for Sexual Health: A Conceptual Analysis

¹

,

²

,

³

et al. 2021

Front. Psychol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on its prevalence, there is an urgent need to better understand the mechanisms, opportunities and risks of sexual interaction in digital contexts (SIDC) that are related with sexual arousal. While there is a growing body of literature on SIDC, there is also a lack of conceptual clarity and classification. Therefore, based on a conceptual analysis, we propose to distinguish between sexual interaction (1) through, (2) via, and (3) with digital technologies. (1) Sexual interactions through digital technologies are face-to-face sexual interactions that (a) have been started digitally (e.g., people initiating face-to-face sexual encounters through adult dating apps) or (b) are accompanied by digital technology (e.g., couples augmenting their face-to-face sexual encounters through filming themselves during the act and publishing the amateur pornography online). (2) Sexual interactions via digital technology are technology-mediated interpersonal sexual interactions (e.g., via text chat: cybersex; via smartphone: sexting; via webcam: webcam sex/camming). (3) Sexual interactions with digital technology occur when the technology itself has the role of an interaction partner (e.g., sexual interaction with a sex robot or with a media persona in pornography). The three types of SIDC and their respective subtypes are explained and backed up with empirical studies that are grouped according to two major mediators: consent and commerce. Regarding the causes and consequences of the three types of SIDC we suggest a classification that entails biological, psychological, social, economic, and technological factors. Regarding implications of SIDC we suggest to focus on both opportunities and risks for sexual health. The proposed conceptual framework of SIDC is meant to inform future research.

“…Traditional digital pornography comes in a variety of media forms. The literature differentiates between text-based (e.g., erotic fan fiction; Floegel, 2020 ; Döring, 2021 ), audio-based (e.g., adult phone line recordings; Glascock and LaRose, 1993 ), image-based and computer-generated (e.g., erotic manga and anime; Vučurović, 2016 ; Baudinette, 2017 ; erotic gifs; Hester et al, 2015 ; GGI porn; Saunders, 2019 ) and/or video-based digital pornographic content (e.g., cyberporn; Ashton et al, 2019 ). Research on traditional digital pornography mostly focuses on video-based or 2-dimensional (2D) audiovisual digital pornography.…”

Section: Sexual Interaction With Digital Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sexual Interaction in Digital Contexts and Its Implications for Sexual Health: A Conceptual Analysis

¹

,

²

,

³

et al. 2021

Front. Psychol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on its prevalence, there is an urgent need to better understand the mechanisms, opportunities and risks of sexual interaction in digital contexts (SIDC) that are related with sexual arousal. While there is a growing body of literature on SIDC, there is also a lack of conceptual clarity and classification. Therefore, based on a conceptual analysis, we propose to distinguish between sexual interaction (1) through, (2) via, and (3) with digital technologies. (1) Sexual interactions through digital technologies are face-to-face sexual interactions that (a) have been started digitally (e.g., people initiating face-to-face sexual encounters through adult dating apps) or (b) are accompanied by digital technology (e.g., couples augmenting their face-to-face sexual encounters through filming themselves during the act and publishing the amateur pornography online). (2) Sexual interactions via digital technology are technology-mediated interpersonal sexual interactions (e.g., via text chat: cybersex; via smartphone: sexting; via webcam: webcam sex/camming). (3) Sexual interactions with digital technology occur when the technology itself has the role of an interaction partner (e.g., sexual interaction with a sex robot or with a media persona in pornography). The three types of SIDC and their respective subtypes are explained and backed up with empirical studies that are grouped according to two major mediators: consent and commerce. Regarding the causes and consequences of the three types of SIDC we suggest a classification that entails biological, psychological, social, economic, and technological factors. Regarding implications of SIDC we suggest to focus on both opportunities and risks for sexual health. The proposed conceptual framework of SIDC is meant to inform future research.

“…The first concept refers to the fandom in which female fans form homoerotic fantasies based on two real men, such as actors, politicians, and historical figures [1]. The second concept refers to fan fiction describing homosexual romantic relationships [2][3][4]. Here uses the first concept to study RPS fans.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Flourish of RPS in China

¹

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, natural person slash(RPS) has become popular in China. RPS is female fans form homoerotic fantasies based on two real men. They are regarded as a kind of fujoshi who gain their pleasure through derivative works. It does not have a long history but has a significant social influence in todays China. The study aims to analyze the flourishing of RPS in China, mainly focusing on consumer society and the symbolic exchange theory and how they are connected with the flourishing of RPS fan culture. The study also analyzes the rebellion of the culture industry and the mainstream. The relationship between RPS fans and gender inequality is also explored in the study. The author suggests that the government pay attention to the RPS fans situation and help them gain more rights and live freer instead of escaping reality through RPS.

“…Eigene Sub-Gattungen für Rough-Sex-Praktiken würden nicht existieren, wenn es kein interessiertes Publikum gäbe, das entsprechende Videos abruft. Auch in der stärker frauendominierten Textpornografie sind Elemente von Rough Sex und BDSM 5 präsent(Döring 2021).Ein weiterer Indikator für wachsende Popularität ist die zunehmende Sichtbarkeit des Themas Rough Sex im öffentlichen Diskurs, das heißt in Massenmedien und Sozialen Medien. Publikumszeit-4 So enthält beispielsweise das deutsche Sex-Survey "GeSID" (Gesundheit und Sexualität in Deutschland; www.gesid.eu) keine Frage zu Rough Sex und nur eine Frage zu BDSM, die sich darauf bezieht, ob man "sado-masochistische Praktiken/BDSM" schon einmal ausprobiert hat oder einmal ausprobieren möchte.…”

unclassified

Rough Sex: Aktueller Diskussions- und Forschungsstand

¹

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ZusammenfassungUnter hartem Sex (engl. rough sex) wird aggressiver konsensueller Sex verstanden. Dazu gehören beispielsweise Aktivitäten wie Aufs-Bett-Werfen, Kleider-Herunterreißen, Haare-Ziehen, Schlagen oder Würgen. Rough-Sex-Praktiken sind in den letzten Jahren medial sichtbarer und vermutlich auch populärer geworden. Ihnen sind ganze Pornografie-Gattungen gewidmet und sie werden in Sozialen Medien diskutiert. Große Bevölkerungsteile berichten eigene Erfahrungen mit ausgewählten harten Sexpraktiken. Die Normalisierung von Rough Sex wird mit verschiedenen Gefahren, insbesondere für Frauen, in Verbindung gebracht. Der vorliegende Beitrag fasst den aktuellen Diskussionsstand zusammen, weist auf Forschungslücken hin und diskutiert Konsequenzen für die sexualpädagogische Praxis.

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Product

Browser Extension Assistant by scite Citation Statement Search Reference Check Visualizations Dashboards Explore Journals Explore Organizations Explore Funders Embedding Badge Embedding Citation Search Pricing

Resources

Blog Help & FAQ Accessibility Statement API Terms For Universities & Governments For Researchers For Publishers For Corporate, Pharma & Enterprise Author Marketing Become an Affiliate Get an organization trial or quote scite Data & Services

About

News & Press Careers Read our Paper Coverage

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.