Abstract:Removal of nonnative riparian trees is accelerating to conserve water and improve habitat for native species. Widespread control of dominant species, however, can lead to unintended erosion. Helicopter herbicide application in 2003 along a 12-km reach of the Rio Puerco, New Mexico, eliminated the target invasive species saltcedar (Tamarix spp.), which dominated the floodplain, as well as the native species sandbar willow (Salix exigua Nuttall), which occurred as a fringe along the channel. Herbicide applicatio… Show more
“…Willow may be an important indicator of overall riparian health for some systems (Booth et al 2012). Willows help reduce stream temperatures (Zoellick 2004;White and Rahel 2008) and protect stream banks against erosion (Vincent et al 2009). The strong increase in willow cover observed in this study suggests that riparian systems at Hart Mountain are more stable, provide better habitat for many species, and are more resistant to erosion than when cattle were present.…”
We assessed the effects of the elimination of livestock in riparian systems at Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge in southeastern Oregon, 23 years after the removal of cattle grazing, using 64 photos taken before grazing was removed compared with later retake photos. Two methods were used for this assessment: (1) a qualitative visual method comparing seven cover types and processes and (2) a new quantitative method of inserting digital line transects into photos. Results indicated that channel widths and eroding banks decreased in 64 and 73% of sites, respectively. We found a 90% decrease in the amount of bare soil (P < 0.001) and a 63% decrease in exposed channel (P< 0.001) as well as a significant increase in the cover of grasses/sedges/forbs (15% increase, P = 0.037), rushes (389% increase, P = 0.014), and willow (388% increase, P < 0.001). We also assessed the accuracy of the new method of inserting digital line transects into photo pairs. An overall accuracy of 91% (kappa 83%) suggests that digital line transects can be a useful tool for quantifying vegetation cover from photos. Our results indicate that the removal of cattle can result in dramatic changes in riparian vegetation, even in semi-arid landscapes and without replanting or other active restoration efforts.
“…Willow may be an important indicator of overall riparian health for some systems (Booth et al 2012). Willows help reduce stream temperatures (Zoellick 2004;White and Rahel 2008) and protect stream banks against erosion (Vincent et al 2009). The strong increase in willow cover observed in this study suggests that riparian systems at Hart Mountain are more stable, provide better habitat for many species, and are more resistant to erosion than when cattle were present.…”
We assessed the effects of the elimination of livestock in riparian systems at Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge in southeastern Oregon, 23 years after the removal of cattle grazing, using 64 photos taken before grazing was removed compared with later retake photos. Two methods were used for this assessment: (1) a qualitative visual method comparing seven cover types and processes and (2) a new quantitative method of inserting digital line transects into photos. Results indicated that channel widths and eroding banks decreased in 64 and 73% of sites, respectively. We found a 90% decrease in the amount of bare soil (P < 0.001) and a 63% decrease in exposed channel (P< 0.001) as well as a significant increase in the cover of grasses/sedges/forbs (15% increase, P = 0.037), rushes (389% increase, P = 0.014), and willow (388% increase, P < 0.001). We also assessed the accuracy of the new method of inserting digital line transects into photo pairs. An overall accuracy of 91% (kappa 83%) suggests that digital line transects can be a useful tool for quantifying vegetation cover from photos. Our results indicate that the removal of cattle can result in dramatic changes in riparian vegetation, even in semi-arid landscapes and without replanting or other active restoration efforts.
“…The data obtained by the dendrogeomorphic analyses show that in the absence of channel-resetting floods (i.e., >10 yr recurrence interval), control of vegetation during low-flow periods may prevent the stabilization of near-channel surfaces until floods of a sufficient magnitude and duration erode the accumulated channel sediments. Other studies (Pollen-Bankhead et al, 2009;Vincent et al, 2009) have shown that vegetation removal is a feasible mechanism to promote bank destabilization and channel widening. Although management efforts are focused on the promotion of bank destabilization, and limiting the rate and magnitude of channel narrowing, it must also be noted that other associated environmental effects of erosion, such as salt and contaminant transport, are currently unknown.…”
“…Tamarix is now the third most common woody plant in western US riparian areas (Friedman et al 2005), and is considered a noxious weed in most states west of the Mississippi River. Tamarisk dominance has led to alterations of riparian ecosystems including soil salinization, local reduction in water resources via excess transpiration (Sala et al 1996;Dahm et al 2002), changing erosion and sedimentation regimes (Graf 1978;Vincent et al 2009), and increasing the susceptibility of riparian areas to wildfire (Busch and Smith 1993;Dudley et al 2011) although the environmental impact of some of these factors has been questioned (Sogge et al 2008;Hultine et al 2010). Tamarix spp.…”
Section: Tamarix Biocontrol Program Historymentioning
A long-standing debate between wildlife agencies and biological control researchers and practitioners concerns Diorhabda carinulata Desbrochers (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) introduced to suppress invasive Tamarix spp. (Tamaricaceae), and potential impacts of Tamarix defoliation on endangered southwestern willow flycatchers using this non-native plant as nesting habitat in some western riparian ecosystems. The conflict and ensuing legal actions are currently centered on the presence of D. carinulata within the breeding range of the flycatcher in the Virgin River watershed, which has led to APHIS termination of permits supporting the biocontrol development program and has also affected other programs to develop biocontrol agents against environmental weeds. Central to concerns over wildlife is the lack of rehabilitation of native vegetation where biocontrol is expected, so there are current and planned efforts to promote restoration of native cottonwood-willow habitat to mitigate the anticipation decline in Tamarix cover. A strategic approach to riparian restoration is outlined which could facilitate sustainable, and scientifically documented recovery of this iconic habitat type. While the results of these efforts will not be known immediately, the process which is leading to riparian restoration has brought specialists from both sides of the debate together in search of resolution via collaboration, and if successful, may allow re-initiation of the Tamarix biocontrol program attendant with habitat enhancement for wildlife species of conservation concern.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citationsâcitations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.