1999
DOI: 10.1585/jspf.75.416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erosion and Carbon Deposition on Boron Exposed to Plasmas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further simulation calculations modeled the roughness, such as dynamic simulation of surface topography changes [19], are necessary for the detailed discussion.…”
Section: Comparison With Redeposition Patterns On C and W Roof-like Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further simulation calculations modeled the roughness, such as dynamic simulation of surface topography changes [19], are necessary for the detailed discussion.…”
Section: Comparison With Redeposition Patterns On C and W Roof-like Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, chemically eroded ethane and propane families should be considered in the estimation of tritium retention. In previous studies, redeposition profiles and characteristics of CH 4 [2] and of C 2 H 4 and C 2 H 6 [3] were investigated using a simple model for divertor plasma region (constant plasma temperature and density). Further, in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in Ref. 3, poloidal distributions of redeposited carbons/hydrocarbons on the divertor surface were calculated. However, characteristics of author's e-mail: kawazome@di.kagawa-nct.ac.jp * ) This article is based on the presentation at the 20th International Toki Conference (ITC20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when the temperature is 1 eV, the rate coefficient of electron impact dissociation D CH 4 and of electron impact ionization S CH 4 are three and five orders of magnitude less than that of charge exchange ionization CX CH 4 , respectively (CX CH 4 ∼ 10 −9 m 3 /s, D CH 4 ∼ 72, respectively, and emission event do not vary linearly with the excitation rate coefficient. These results are caused by increase of additional emission events from reflected molecules at the divertor plate [11]. The friction force, which toward the divertor plate, at the plasma density of 10 18 m −3 is smaller than these at the plasma density of 10 19 and 10 20 m −3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The rate coefficients for reactions (a) -(d) are referred from data set of Janev and Reiter [9,10]. Reflection coefficients of all of the dissociation products on the surface are evaluated by a classical molecular dynamics simulation [11]. Hydrocarbon molecule ions, which are produced by the reaction with ionization process, gy-rate due to the Lorentz force and move along the direction parallel to the magnetic field lines due to a force F .…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%