Eric Wolf: A semiotic exploration of power

Abstract

This paper discusses Eric Wolf’s (1923–1999) analysis of power in his last monograph, Anthropology (Wolf 1964) and last book Envisioning Power (Wolf 1999). In Anthropology, Wolf (1964: 96) wrote that the “anthropological point of vantage is that of a world culture, struggling to be born.” What is worth studying is human experience in all its variability and complexity. His aim was to set the framework bridging the humanities with anthropology. He never gave up this quest, only expanding it. In the new introduction to his 1964 monograph, thirty years later, he commented that such a synthesis had not occurred. Rather there were growing schisms in the field. In the preface to Envisioning Power, he held that human sciences were unable or unwilling to come to grips with how cultural configurations intertwine with considerations of power. In 1990 he had addressed the American Anthropological Society, holding that anthropologists favored a view of culture without power, while other social sciences have advanced a concept of ideology without culture. He wrote that his aim in his last book was to explore the connection of ideas and power observed in streams of behavior and recorded texts. Since minds interpose a selective screen between the organism and environment, ideas have content and functions that help bring people together or divide them. While ideas compose the entire range of mental constructs, Wolf understands ideology as configurations or unified schemes to underwrite or manifest power. Power is, according to Wolf, an aspect of all relations among people. Within this framework Wolf analyzes three cases, the Kwakiutl, the Aztecs, and Nazi Germany. The comparisons are very revealing, both the wide differences and similarities in power configurations and in the role of imagination.

Global Power and Local Struggles in Developing Countries: An Introduction

“…And yet there is strong evidence, too, that social, political, and economic inequalities within many developing and developed countries have increased. Total global wealth today is concentrated in fewer and fewer pockets and there are increasing numbers of people needing humanitarian assistance (Piketty 2014;Standing 2011;Ourworlddata.org;oecd.org).16 16…”

Impossible Histories, Power, and Exclusion in the Gold Coast and Ghana 1930–2020

“…One starting point is to recognize power as a notoriously slippery concept where, on the one hand, it is often central in explanations for societal change, yet, on the other, is often ill-defined, used in the abstract as either a catch-all or as a singular unexplained force, or understood as an ideological charge (Hall et al 2011). In epwh, and especially in later works, Wolf established an open and comparative approach to power, which theretofore was a concept most routinely encountered in Universalist philosophy (Portis-Winner 2006).4 In brief, Wolf distinguished four modalities of power: (1) embodied or inherent as an individual attribute or capability;…”

“…Wolf's conceptualization of power bridges Foucault's focus -its impact on consciousness, omnipresence, and indeterminacy -with that of Marx, where power is manifest in the shaping of the political economy and particularly the organization of labour (Portis-Winner 2006). By Wolf, the history of Nawuri is consequently explained in his chapter as that of a 'people without history' emerging from an unfavourable positioning in structural power, which shapes the social setting, the organization of the group, and where 'both the people who claim history as their own and the people to whom history has been denied emerge as participants in the same historical trajectory' (Wolf 1982: 23).…”