2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01243.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonomics in minimally invasive surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research, however, has demonstrated no effect of either position on an increase in BDI [23]. A postulation was recently put forth that the American technique may not result in the most favorable ergonomic posture [6]. Our study establishes that the American side-standing technique does pose a risk of physical injury for the surgeon in comparison with the between-standing French technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent research, however, has demonstrated no effect of either position on an increase in BDI [23]. A postulation was recently put forth that the American technique may not result in the most favorable ergonomic posture [6]. Our study establishes that the American side-standing technique does pose a risk of physical injury for the surgeon in comparison with the between-standing French technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…These include deliberate exposure of the Calot's triangle [2], establishment of the ''critical view'' [3], and use of the ''top-down'' (retrograde dissection) technique [4]. Little beyond description and speculation, however, has been published about the surgeon's standing position or use of the one-versus two-handed technique [5][6][7][8], and currently there are no agreed-upon recommendations in terms of how these two primary elements affect LC performance [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from superior visualization and articulated instrumentation, the improved ergonomic position offered at the robotic console benefits the surgeon during prolonged procedures [11]. In 2003, Menon et al first reported the feasibility of RLRC using the da Vinci® surgical system [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery (RMIS) has come to the forefront in the last decades since this technology can provide enhanced dexterity and 3D perception of the surgical field. These advantages produce a surgical approach that is more ergonomic for surgeons and safer for patients, as described in Elhage et al (2007). Specifically, RMIS allows the surgeon to access small and complex anatomical districts (e.g., digestive tract), and perform surgery with reduced invasiveness and in a more intuitive and confident way according to Pavan et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%