2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonomics assessment methods used by ergonomics professionals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the 1995 SI has shown predictive validity in prospective cohort studies of specific DUE MSDs such as CTS (Silverstein et al 2006, lateral and medial epicondylalgia (Fan et al 2014;Garg et al 2014), hand/wrist tendinitis (Harris-Adamson et al 2014), and trigger digit (Kapellusch et al 2014). As of 2019 the 1995 SI was reported as among the most widely used distal upper extremity assessment methods used by ergonomics professionals in the United States and Canada (Lowe, Dempsey, and Jones 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the 1995 SI has shown predictive validity in prospective cohort studies of specific DUE MSDs such as CTS (Silverstein et al 2006, lateral and medial epicondylalgia (Fan et al 2014;Garg et al 2014), hand/wrist tendinitis (Harris-Adamson et al 2014), and trigger digit (Kapellusch et al 2014). As of 2019 the 1995 SI was reported as among the most widely used distal upper extremity assessment methods used by ergonomics professionals in the United States and Canada (Lowe, Dempsey, and Jones 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders, it is necessary to evaluate workplaces ergonomically [ 3 ]. In one common approach, an ergonomics expert observes the employee performing the movements necessary for the planned work process at his/her workplace [ 4 ]. Observed postures and the dynamic ranges of movement are incorporated into a risk assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative is to shift the focus to proactive risk management [ 19 ], where risk assessments of potential hazards are performed at earlier stages before symptoms such as work-related pain have emerged [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Such risk assessments are often performed by professional ergonomists with the direct or indirect support of observation-based assessment tools [ 14 , 24 , 25 ]. Despite the broad applicability of observation-based assessment tools [ 26 , 27 ], they can have low precision and reliability [ 28 , 29 ], and can additionally be less cost-efficient than technical measurement instruments when considering the precision of the obtained data [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technical measurement instruments for the recording of work postures and movements have in the past mainly been applicable for research, and they are still scarcely used among professional ergonomists compared to observation-based tools [ 24 ]. For example, among professional ergonomists in the US, only about 12% reported using non-optical motion capture instruments at least once every six months, and less than 5% reported using electronic goniometer for the wrist or trunk at least once every six months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%