2012
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2012.700327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonomics action research I: shifting from hypothesis testing to experiential learning

Abstract: Researchers should engage directly with organisations in ergonomics projects so that they can better understand the challenges and needs of practitioners who are trying to apply available scientific knowledge in their own unique context. Such 'Action Research' could help develop theory and approaches useful to improve mobilisation and application of ergonomics knowledge in organisations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas scientists attempt to form objective conclusions in a given set of circumstances (and at the risk of not being able to be conclusive), the manager in industry needs to make a practical decision, often in spite of uncertainty in the evidence [9]. Neumann et al [10] have explained how generalised knowledge of science is insufficient for successful change and needs to be absorbed and combined with the existing experienced based knowledge from practitioners in organisations. Action research [10] or participatory ergonomics to embed human factors in organisations [24] are promoted as ways forward for researchers to work collaboratively with stakeholders.…”
Section: Looking Again At the Roles Of The Researcher And Managermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas scientists attempt to form objective conclusions in a given set of circumstances (and at the risk of not being able to be conclusive), the manager in industry needs to make a practical decision, often in spite of uncertainty in the evidence [9]. Neumann et al [10] have explained how generalised knowledge of science is insufficient for successful change and needs to be absorbed and combined with the existing experienced based knowledge from practitioners in organisations. Action research [10] or participatory ergonomics to embed human factors in organisations [24] are promoted as ways forward for researchers to work collaboratively with stakeholders.…”
Section: Looking Again At the Roles Of The Researcher And Managermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neumann et al [10] have explained how generalised knowledge of science is insufficient for successful change and needs to be absorbed and combined with the existing experienced based knowledge from practitioners in organisations. Action research [10] or participatory ergonomics to embed human factors in organisations [24] are promoted as ways forward for researchers to work collaboratively with stakeholders. I have very much appreciated the analogy provided by Francois Daniellou, of the need for "researchers with dirty hands"placing researchers on the beach with the people, rather than viewing the people from the clifftop.…”
Section: Looking Again At the Roles Of The Researcher And Managermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of human factors research and development (R&D) in an organization can be viewed as an instance of change management requiring good planning, timely execution, and constant interaction between the research team and organizational stakeholders (Holden, Or, Alper, Rivera, & Karsh, 2008). Although some have written about the challenge of individual-or organization-level implementation of human factors interventions (Haslam, 2002;Penteado et al, 2012) or specific approaches for successful implementation (Neumann, Dixon, & Ekman, 2012), few deliberately investigate or even adequately describe their implementation process, challenges faced, and strategies used (Holden et al, 2008). Because of a pervasive publication bias toward positive results (Thornton & Lee, 2000), it is likely that human factors R&D projects that suffered from implementation challenges and, for example, resulted in compromised methods or findings, are underrepresented in publications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show that complex work-related stress is affected not only by physical activities but also by mental and psychological factors and the heart rate increment is suitable to describe these complex effects. Several papers have recently been published [32][33][34][35][36] on widening the scope and importance of complex work stress, which increasingly justify the application of instrumental physiological measurements and the importance of examining these problems. Studying the strain of the human organism associated with work activities requires complex methods, including physiological measurements.…”
Section: Impact Of the Illumination Level On Work-related Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%