2009
DOI: 10.1190/1.3008544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalent viscoelastic solids for heterogeneous fluid-saturated porous rocks

Abstract: Different theoretical and laboratory studies on the propagation of elastic waves in real rocks have shown that the presence of heterogeneities larger than the pore size but smaller than the predominant wavelengths ͑mesoscopic-scale heterogeneities͒ may produce significant attenuation and velocity dispersion effects on seismic waves. Such phenomena are known as "mesoscopic effects" and are caused by equilibration of wave-induced fluid pressure gradients. We propose a numerical upscaling procedure to obtain equi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
136
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
136
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This is compounded by the necessity to employ small enough grid spacings to properly discretize the fractures, which is an issue both in the low-and high-frequency ranges. To overcome these problems, we employ a numerical upscaling procedure similar to that presented by Rubino et al [2009]. We do, however, impose strain boundary conditions instead of stress boundary conditions, as relaxation experiments turned out to be more suitable for analyzing the P wave seismic response of rock samples containing very strong compressibility contrasts (M. Milani, personal communication, 2014).…”
Section: Appendix A: Numerical Analysis Of Quasi-static Poroelasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is compounded by the necessity to employ small enough grid spacings to properly discretize the fractures, which is an issue both in the low-and high-frequency ranges. To overcome these problems, we employ a numerical upscaling procedure similar to that presented by Rubino et al [2009]. We do, however, impose strain boundary conditions instead of stress boundary conditions, as relaxation experiments turned out to be more suitable for analyzing the P wave seismic response of rock samples containing very strong compressibility contrasts (M. Milani, personal communication, 2014).…”
Section: Appendix A: Numerical Analysis Of Quasi-static Poroelasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluid is not allowed to flow into or out of the sample. To obtain the response of the sample, we numerically solve the equations of quasi-static poroelasticity under corresponding boundary conditions [Rubino et al, 2009]. This methodology allows for computing the relative fluid velocity field P w which is then employed to calculate the corresponding seismoelectric signal.…”
Section: Methodological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies about numerical modeling of these effects, e.g. [25], [26], [27], showing that they are strongly dependent on the shapes and characteristic lengths of the patches. Given that these parameters are rarely known, to avoid dealing with this uncertainty, in our analysis we assume elastic layers where no attenuation-dispersion phenomena, associated with the patchy fluid distribution take place.…”
Section: Elastic Properties Of Co 2 Bearing Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%