Equivalency of Microtest computer MMPI administration for standard and special scales

Honaker, L.Michael; Harrell, Thomas H.; Buffaloe, Janis D.

doi:10.1016/0747-5632(88)90004-0

Cited by 27 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous work by Honaker and coworkers used a similar strategy to compare the results of microtest computer and conventional, paperbased Minnesota multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) [9,10]. Retest reliability was tested using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm‐top computers and paper surveys

Saleh

Radosevich

Kassim

et al. 2002

Journal Orthopaedic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Measuring patient-perceived outcomes following orthopaedic procedures have become an important component of clinical research and patient care. General and disease-specific outcomes measures have been developed and applied in orthopaedics to assess the patients' perceived health status. Unfortunately, paper-based, self-administered instruments remain inefficient for collecting data because of: (a) missing data (b) respondent error, and (c) the costs to administer and enter data.Ohjectioe: To study the comparability of palm-top computer devices and paper-pencil self-administered questionnaires in the collection of health-related quality of life (HRQL) information from patients.Methods: The comparability of administering HRQL questionnaires using palm-top computer and traditional paper-based forms was tested in a sample of 96 patients with complaints of hip and/or knee pain. Each patient completed mailed versions of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS), 36-item Health Survey (SF-36), and Western Ontario and McMasters University Arthritis Index (WOMAC) three weeks prior to presenting to clinic. At the clinic they were asked to complete the same outcomes measures using the palm-top computer or a paper-and-pencil version.Analysis: In the analysis, scale distributions, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency and retest reliability of scales were compared across the two data collection methods. Because the baseline characteristics of the groups were not strictly comparable according to age, the data were analyzed for the entire sample and stratified according to age.Results: Few statistically significant differences were found for the means, variances and intra-class correlation coefficients between the methods of administration. While the scale distribution between the two methods was comparable, the internal consistency of the scales was dissimilar.Conclusions: Administration of HRQL questionnaires using portable palm-top computer devices has the potential advantage of decreased cost and convenience. These data lend some support for the comparability of palm-top computers and paper surveys for outcomes measures widely used in the field of orthopaedic surgery. The present study identified the lack of reliability across modes of administration that requires further study in a randomized comparability trial. These mode effects are important for orthopaedic surgeons to appreciate before implementing innovative data-capture technologies in their practices.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm‐top computers and paper surveys

Saleh

Radosevich

Kassim

et al. 2002

Journal Orthopaedic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Of the nine studies [129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137] that reported the use of the MMPI, data were available from three studies 129,131,134 for between-subject comparisons only, one study 136 for within-subject comparisons only and three studies 132,133,135 for both. …”

Section: Meta-analysis Of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Invenmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nine studies [129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137] published between 1994 and 2003 used the MMPI. Not all of the studies reported all subscales.…”

Section: Meta-analysis Of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Invenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mode of data elicitation, acquisition and response to surveys: a systematic review.

Hood

Robling²,

Ingledew³

et al. 2012

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How to obtain copies of this and other HTA programme reports An electronic version of this title, in Adobe Acrobat format, is available for downloading free of charge for personal use from the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk). A fully searchable DVD is also available (see below).Printed copies of HTA journal series issues cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our despatch agents.Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per issue and for the rest of the world £3 per issue. How to order:-fax (with credit card details) -post (with credit card details or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you to either print out your order or download a blank order form. Contact details are as follows:Synergie UK (HTA Department) Digital House, The Loddon Centre Wade Road Basingstoke Hants RG24 8QW Email: orders@hta.ac.uk Tel: 0845 812 4000 -ask for 'HTA Payment Services' (out-of-hours answer-phone service) Fax: 0845 812 4001 -put 'HTA Order' on the fax header Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to University of Southampton and drawn on a bank with a UK address.Paying by credit card You can order using your credit card by phone, fax or post. SubscriptionsNHS libraries can subscribe free of charge. Public libraries can subscribe at a reduced cost of £100 for each volume (normally comprising 40-50 titles). The commercial subscription rate is £400 per volume (addresses within the UK) and £600 per volume (addresses outside the UK). Please see our website for details. Subscriptions can be purchased only for the current or forthcoming volume.How do I get a copy of HTA on DVD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd/index.shtml). HTA on DVD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTAMode of data elicitation, acquisition and response to surveys: a systematic review NIHR Health Technology Assessment programmeThe Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care. The research findings from the HTA programme directly influence decision-making bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC). HTA findings also help to improve the quality of clinical practice in the NHS indirectly in that they form a key component of the 'National Knowledge Service' . The HTA programme is needs led in that it fills gaps ...

show abstract

“…Distribucije skorova su jednako nestabilne bez obzira na modalitet, a tu nestabilnost smo skloni da pripišemo primeni kliničkog testa na nekliničkom uzorku, te metrijskim karakteristikama testa. Ovakvi nalazi su u skladu i sa prethodnim istraživanjima različitih modaliteta MMPI (Finger & Ones, 1999;Honaker, Harrell, & Buffaloe, 1988).…”

Section: Diskusijaunclassified

Jednakost Profila Dobijenih Računarski Podržanim I Klasičnim Modalitetom Mmpi-202

Janičić

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sa sve većom primenom računarski administriranih testova javlja se problem jednakosti merenja klasičnom i računarski podržanom formom. Ispitivanja ekvivalencije računarski podržanog i modaliteta papir-olovka obično uključuju i ispitivanje uticaja individualnih razlika i varijabli kao što su računarsko iskustvo i računarska anksioznost. Dosadašnja istraživanja dala su nekonzistentne rezultate. Cilj ovog istraživanja je bio da utvrdi da li postoje razlike u profilima ispitanika dobijenim pomoću računarski podržane i klasične verzije MMPI-202. Takođe, cilj ovog istraživanja je bio da ispita uticaj pola, starosti, nivoa obrazovanja, računarskog iskustva i računarske anksioznosti jednakost profila ispitanika na računarskom i klasičnom modalitetu ovog testa. Nije utvrđe-no postojanje razlika u profilima ispitanika koje se mogu pripisati modalitetu testiranja.Ključne reči: MMPI-202, računarski podržano testiranje, jednakost merenja, iskustvena ekvivalencija, sličnost profila 2 Rad je nastao u okviru projekta Ministarstva za prosvetu, nauku i tehnološki razvoj "Nasledni, sredinski i psihološki činioci mentalnog zdravlja" (broj 179006).

show abstract

Equivalency of Microtest computer MMPI administration for standard and special scales

Cited by 27 publications

References 24 publications

Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm‐top computers and paper surveys

Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm‐top computers and paper surveys

Mode of data elicitation, acquisition and response to surveys: a systematic review.

Jednakost Profila Dobijenih Računarski Podržanim I Klasičnim Modalitetom Mmpi-202

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About