1982
DOI: 10.1068/a141479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equity, Efficiency, and Accessibility in Urban and Regional Health-Care Systems

Abstract: FOREWORDThe principal aim o f health care research at IIASA has been to develop a family of submodels of national health care systems to be used by health service planners. The modeling work has involved the construction of linked submodels dealing with population, disease prevalence, resource need, resource allocation, and resource supply.This article considers four resource allocation criteria for assessing the long-term health resource requirements of different areas in a region. The spatial interaction mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be measured (modeled) as travel time, travel costs as well as in a more subjective way as relative travel costs (e.g., travel costs by clients incomes) or ultimately as the levels of clients dissatisfaction (individual disutility) of location decisions. Several specialized measures of proximity or accessibility have been developed for public service delivery systems (Abernathy and Hershey 1972;Malczewski 2000;Mayhew and Leonardi 1982;Tsou et al 2005). In typical formulations of location problems related to desirable facilities a smaller value of the outcome (distance) means a better effect (higher service quality or client satisfaction).…”
Section: Efficiency and Inequality Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They can be measured (modeled) as travel time, travel costs as well as in a more subjective way as relative travel costs (e.g., travel costs by clients incomes) or ultimately as the levels of clients dissatisfaction (individual disutility) of location decisions. Several specialized measures of proximity or accessibility have been developed for public service delivery systems (Abernathy and Hershey 1972;Malczewski 2000;Mayhew and Leonardi 1982;Tsou et al 2005). In typical formulations of location problems related to desirable facilities a smaller value of the outcome (distance) means a better effect (higher service quality or client satisfaction).…”
Section: Efficiency and Inequality Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, various public facilities (or public service delivery systems) like schools, libraries, health-service centers etc. require some spatial equity while making locationallocation decisions (Coulter 1980;Mayhew and Leonardi 1982;O'Brien 1969). Equity is usually quantified with the so-called inequality measures to be minimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types, quality, and costs of health services vary spatially, and as a result, impact individual access. Proximity is highly correlated with health services utilization (Mayhew and Leonardi 1982) and is also important for saving lives (Cudnik et al 2012). Measures and metrics associated with spatial access abound.…”
Section: Provision and Accessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We note that the equity criterion is commonly considered in combination with the efficiency (access) criterion since the equity objectives alone can produce undesirable solutions (Smith et al 2013). The reader can refer to Mayhew and Leonardi (1982), Cho (1998), Mitropoulos et al (2006), and Smith et al (2009Smith et al ( , 2013 for examples on applications with bi-criteria equity-efficiency objectives. Stummer et al (2004) developed a multi-objective model to determine the size and location of departments in facilities within a given network of hospitals.…”
Section: Objective Functions In Healthcare Facility Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%