Equitable representation of deaf people in mainstream academia: Why not?

Abstract

Approximately 5% of people in most countries have deafness or significant hearing loss. This significant minority is underrepresented in mainstream universities across the world. Background information about deafness, relevant technology and its drawbacks, and the use of interpreters are discussed. The barriers to equitable representation of qualified Deaf academics in university settings are reviewed. The experiences of three Deaf academics who teach in mainstream universities are discussed, and suggestions for resolution are offered. Examples are cited for teaching, research and service, the threefold duties of the successful academic. Continuing access difficulties mean that only a few deaf graduates now consider doctoral study; cost and the perception of cost, as well as negative attitudes and lack of knowledge may mean that the few successful graduates have difficulties gaining employment; successful tenure and promotion prospects may also be hindered for the same reasons. We also provide recommendations how barriers for successful Deaf academics can be removed or mitigated.

What About Me? Theorizing Power and Pushback in Advancing Marginalized Identities

“…The evaluations of both DHH and hearing participants showed a negative bias toward deaf women's competence. Woodcock et al (2007) describe the barriers that Deaf academics face, including the problem of convincing potential colleagues that they can do the job, as well as the hearing community's lack of knowledge about deafness. Once a Deaf academic has been awarded tenure, he or she may not feel encouraged to seek promotion.…”

Toward Ethical Research Practice With Deaf Participants

“…Unfortunately, without a strong presence of Deaf scholars to engage in discussions and review of research protocols in studies involving Deaf people, hearing researchers may continue in their programs of research, securing funding and prestige, without concern for cultural and linguistic issues and the betterment of the Deaf community or quality of deaf education. See Woodcock, Rohan, and Campbell (2007) and Section D in the supplementary material for dis cussion regarding the mentorship of more Deaf scientists and the re-framing of collaboration models. Some Deaf academic scholars have begun to form their own community (www.deafacademics.org) to provide mutual support, encourage up and coming Deaf scholars, and consider new frameworks for conducting science in signed language and proposing new constructs such as Deaf-gain -the transfer of interests, values benefits, and credit that has been given to hearing members to Deaf indi viduals (Bauman & Murray, 2009), D e a f rood-an ecologi cal view that considers deafness not as a deficiency but as a difference and source of pride (Ladd, 2003(Ladd, ,2008, and D eaf epistemologies-a way o f knowing that is unique to Deaf individuals (Bahan, 2008;Hauser, O'Heam, McKee, Steider, & Thew, 2010;Paul & Moores, 2010).…”

“Everyone Was Nice…But I Was Still Left Out”: An Interview Study About Deaf Interns’ Research Experiences in STEM

“…In contrast, research experiences involve intense interaction, with commensurate benefits. Unfortunately, these interactions are predominantly with faculty who have little to no experience working with deaf students and who may have preconceptions about deafness (4,5). …”