1985
DOI: 10.1086/163164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equipartition in multicomponent gravitational systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a core of zero size and formally infinite density) is t cc ∼ 15t rh for an initial Plummer sphere of identical masses. Starting with a more concentrated King (1966) distribution shortens the time of core collapse considerably (Quinlan 1996), as does a broad spectrum of masses (Inagaki & Saslaw 1985). In systems with a mass spectrum, two-body interactions accelerate the dynamical evolution by driving the system toward energy equipartition, in which the velocity dispersions of stars of different masses would have mv 2 ∼ constant.…”
Section: Core Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…a core of zero size and formally infinite density) is t cc ∼ 15t rh for an initial Plummer sphere of identical masses. Starting with a more concentrated King (1966) distribution shortens the time of core collapse considerably (Quinlan 1996), as does a broad spectrum of masses (Inagaki & Saslaw 1985). In systems with a mass spectrum, two-body interactions accelerate the dynamical evolution by driving the system toward energy equipartition, in which the velocity dispersions of stars of different masses would have mv 2 ∼ constant.…”
Section: Core Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-scale for the onset of significant dynamical mass segregation is comparable to the cluster's dynamical relaxation time (Spitzer & Shull 1975;Inagaki & Saslaw 1985;Bonnell & Davies 1998;Elson et al 1998). A cluster's characteristic time-scale may be taken to be its half-mass (or median) relaxation time, i.e., the relaxation time at the mean density for the inner half of the cluster mass for cluster stars with stellar velocity dispersions characteristic for the cluster as a whole (Spitzer & Hart 1971;Lightman & Shapiro 1978;Meylan 1987;Malumuth & Heap 1994).…”
Section: Mass Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct searches by Lindegren et al (2000) and Madsen et al (2001) for a relation between the observed velocity dispersion and mass (or absolute magnitude), did however prove inconclusive. Evidence of any equipartition of kinetic energy is best sought among the stars in the core of the cluster (Inagaki & Saslaw 1985). For the present study, a limiting radius of 3 pc is therefore used.…”
Section: Dispersion Versus Stellar Massmentioning
confidence: 99%