2003
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyades dynamics fromN-body simulations: Accuracy of astrometric radial velocities from Hipparcos

Abstract: Abstract. The internal velocity structure in the Hyades cluster as seen by Hipparcos is compared with realistic N-body simulations using the NBODY6 code, which includes binary interaction, stellar evolution and the Galactic tidal field. The model allows to estimate reliably the accuracy of astrometric radial velocities in the Hyades as derived by Lindegren et al. (2000) and Madsen et al. (2002) from Hipparcos data, by applying the same estimation procedure on the simulated data. The simulations indicate that t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ρ-Oph, for example, the typical core-to-core velocity dispersion is found to be less than 0.4 km s −1 (André et al 2007). The typical stellar velocity dispersion measured in nearby T Tauri associations or open star clusters is similar: ∼0.3 km s −1 for the Hyades (Madsen 2003), ∼0.5−0.6 km s −1 for Coma Berenices, Pleiades, and Praesepe (Madsen et al 2002), and below ∼1 km s −1 for α Per (Makarov 2006), Lupus (Makarov 2007), and the subgroups in Taurus (Jones & Herbig 1979;Bertout & Genova 2006). It only gets above 1 km s −1 for the more massive clusters and OB associations (Madsen et al 2002).…”
Section: Are T Tauri Disks Accreting?mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In ρ-Oph, for example, the typical core-to-core velocity dispersion is found to be less than 0.4 km s −1 (André et al 2007). The typical stellar velocity dispersion measured in nearby T Tauri associations or open star clusters is similar: ∼0.3 km s −1 for the Hyades (Madsen 2003), ∼0.5−0.6 km s −1 for Coma Berenices, Pleiades, and Praesepe (Madsen et al 2002), and below ∼1 km s −1 for α Per (Makarov 2006), Lupus (Makarov 2007), and the subgroups in Taurus (Jones & Herbig 1979;Bertout & Genova 2006). It only gets above 1 km s −1 for the more massive clusters and OB associations (Madsen et al 2002).…”
Section: Are T Tauri Disks Accreting?mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…To do this, we considered the 3D structure of the cluster by using the equatorial coordinates of the stars and G17 parallaxes. Then, we analyzed a few subsample selections of stars within a 3-10 pc radius from the cluster centre, namely between the cluster core and its tidal radius (Madsen 2003). We used the Hyades central coordinates provided in G17.…”
Section: M02mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published studies have employed encounter rate techniques in static cluster backgrounds, Fokker-Planck and Monte Carlo models and direct N -body simulations — e.g., [51, 54, 334, 372, 383, 402, 405, 421, 429, 438, 458, 95, 93, 94, 96, 289, 163, 155, 159, 253, 252, 130, 244, 132, 131, 72, 387, 390, 386, 315, 232, 231, 229]. These models can, if properly interpreted, provide a wealth of information about stellar populations in globular clusters.…”
Section: Dynamical Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%