2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45287-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium of Masonry Vaults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method, put forward in by Angelillo, Fortunato in the paper [4], and applied to simple vaults by Angelillo et al in [1] and to spiral stairs by Angelillo in [2], leans on the use of singular stresses concentrated on surfaces (membranes), on the Monge representation through a function f of the membrane surface, and on the Pucher formulation of membrane equilibrium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The method, put forward in by Angelillo, Fortunato in the paper [4], and applied to simple vaults by Angelillo et al in [1] and to spiral stairs by Angelillo in [2], leans on the use of singular stresses concentrated on surfaces (membranes), on the Monge representation through a function f of the membrane surface, and on the Pucher formulation of membrane equilibrium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the membrane is made of NT material, the surface stress tensor must be negative semi-definite and (as it is shown in [4]) the matrix itself of the projected stresses must be negative semi-definite. In terms of the stress function F , this condition can be translated into the two conditions:…”
Section: (4)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several authors of the Italian school of Structural Mechanics has divulgated and extended such model [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The analysis of masonry-like materials can be conducted within the frame of limit analysis, specifically by applying the static and kinematic theorems on the basis of admissible stress and strain fields (see [18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%