2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41057-5_165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static Analysis of a Double-Cap Masonry Dome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to be solved with respect to the collapse multiplier λ, the normal-force tensor N , the shear-force vector Q, and the bending-moment tensor M . In the next section, a discretization approach will be discussed for achieving an efficient computational solution strategy of problem (20).…”
Section: Lower-bound Limit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…to be solved with respect to the collapse multiplier λ, the normal-force tensor N , the shear-force vector Q, and the bending-moment tensor M . In the next section, a discretization approach will be discussed for achieving an efficient computational solution strategy of problem (20).…”
Section: Lower-bound Limit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is accomplished by a procedure resembling finite-volume discretizations (e.g., see [54]). In particular, the following three steps are involved: (i) a mesh is considered on the mid-surface Σ of the dome, which induces its decomposition into elements (or control volumes, as in the customary notation in finite-volume methods); (ii) a suitable approximation of the shell stress tensors N , Q, and M is introduced by interpolation with nodal values; (iii) the optimization constraints in problem (20) are relaxed by requiring the equilibrium equations (12) and the admissibility inequalities ( 18)-( 19) respectively to hold for the elements and at the nodes of the mesh. Concerning step (i), a mesh is constructed on the mid-surface Σ of the dome as the image, through the map x, of a rectangular mesh in the parameter domain Ω = [a, b] × [0, 2π], as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Problem Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the initial idea proposed in [35,36], blockbased methods have been broadly used for the limit analysis of both 2D and 3D masonry structures in the last twenty years (e.g., see [32,39,56,57]), also assuming non-associative friction flow law (e.g., see [5,12,19,25,49,53]). An extension to masonry domes under horizontal forces has been discussed in [4,13], taking advantage of a point contact model which simplifies the imposition of the failure conditions at block interfaces and results in a cone programming problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%