2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2003.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epitopes recognised by tissue transglutaminase antibodies in coeliac disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), and antibody recognition was also influenced by the loss of domain IV (aa 585-687) but not at all by the absence of domain III (aa 472-584). These results suggested, in accordance with previous data (16)(17)(18), that parts of celiac epitopes are found both on the N-terminal and C-terminal domains. Importantly, patient antibodies, however, did not bind to the mutant containing only domains I-III-IV but not domain II, so in the absence of the anchor points on the core domain the other celiac epitope parts were not capable to form a functional binding site.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1), and antibody recognition was also influenced by the loss of domain IV (aa 585-687) but not at all by the absence of domain III (aa 472-584). These results suggested, in accordance with previous data (16)(17)(18), that parts of celiac epitopes are found both on the N-terminal and C-terminal domains. Importantly, patient antibodies, however, did not bind to the mutant containing only domains I-III-IV but not domain II, so in the absence of the anchor points on the core domain the other celiac epitope parts were not capable to form a functional binding site.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Binding of celiac antibodies to a surface area close to the interface of adjacent domains may be the structural basis for certain conformation stabilizing effect responsible for the earlier observed gain in catalytic activity in the presence of celiac antibodies (8,25). The variable involvement of N-terminal and Cterminal domains explains why earlier studies typically found a sufficient binding if either the N-terminal or C-terminal TG2 parts were missing, but not if both were missing or if the core domain had been disrupted (16)(17)(18). We applied a special precaution to avoid the disruption of hydrogen bonds or the distorsion of the conformation, and the folded structure of our key mutants were confirmed by CD spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown that mutagenesis of flexible residues resulted in increased enzymatic activity of microbial transglutaminase [46]. Binding of coeliac antibodies also may interfere with the regulatory function of the C-terminal part where important target epitopes were located [35,36,47]. Autoantibody binding may facilitate proper folding of TG2 and assist to refold enzyme molecules which became less active by various reasons, including normal decay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, TG2 displays a significant capacity to undergo conformational changes shifting from a more compact protein to a more linear and accessible status, thus affecting the ability of T cells to recognize specific epitopes on its surface. Currently, we do not know whether autoreactive T cells recognize epitopes that are also antibody targets (36). Anti-TG2 autoantibodies, however, do not allow the distinction between active and potential CD since they are present in both, implying that TG2-specific B cell autoimmunity is not predictive of active disease onset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%