1986
DOI: 10.1016/0045-6039(86)90055-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epithelial and basement membrane responses to chick embryo primitive streak grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such heterogeneity in the basement membrane is consistent with a functional association of this structure with the differentiation of the neural plate from the ectoderm (Sanders and Prasad, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Such heterogeneity in the basement membrane is consistent with a functional association of this structure with the differentiation of the neural plate from the ectoderm (Sanders and Prasad, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…5), might reflect such inductive interactions between the expanding hypoblast and the epiblast. Indeed, the cellular mechanisms responsible for ingression and migration during the formation of the primary hypoblast could be comparable to those postulated for (1) the formation of the primitive streak (Mitrani 1982), (2) the inductive effects of posterior streak grafts on the epiblast (Sanders and Prasad 1986) and (3) the invasion of a basement membrane matrix by epiblastic cells (Sanders and Prasad 1989). All these processes imply that the prerequisite steps for epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation are de-epithelization (e.g.…”
Section: Cell Migration and Axialization Of The Embryomentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Primitive streak cells can break down the basal lamina and can continue to do so after the initial formation of the streak and the initial lesion in the basal lamina; bits of exogenous primitive streak transplanted ectopically between the hypoblast and the native primitive streak disrupt the basal lamina (Sanders and Prasad, 1986). This capacity is maintained by the ingressed mesenchymal cells, which invade and disrupt basal lamina matrix (Matrigel) in culture, whereas epiblast cells immediately adjacent to the primitive streak, and hence presumably fated to ingress, but not yet ingressing, penetrated the gel as thin tongues of cells without disrupting it (Sanders and Prasad, 1989a).…”
Section: Changes In the Basal Laminamentioning
confidence: 98%