2002
DOI: 10.1002/sce.10001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks

Abstract: ABSTRACT:A main goal of science education is to help students learn to reason scientifically. A main way to facilitate learning is to engage students in inquiry activities such as conducting experiments. This article presents a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks in terms of how similar they are to authentic science. The framework helps identify the respects in which these reasoning tasks are similar to and different from real scientific research. The framework is based on a recent theory of rea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
678
3
64

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 997 publications
(782 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
11
678
3
64
Order By: Relevance
“…For Kelly and Duschl (2002) epistemic practices are central to knowledge production, communication, and appropriation, and they suggest three issues as potentially fruitful for epistemological studies in science education: representing data, persuading peers, and observing from a particular point of view. Chinn and Malhotra (2002) constructed a frame for analyzing the differences in the epistemology promoted in authentic inquiry, carried by scientists, and in school inquiry, for instance the theory -data coordination and the response to anomalous data. The epistemic status of students' claims, from lower to higher induction level, has been examined by Kelly and Chen (1999).…”
Section: Contextualizing Practices and Meaning Making: Background Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Kelly and Duschl (2002) epistemic practices are central to knowledge production, communication, and appropriation, and they suggest three issues as potentially fruitful for epistemological studies in science education: representing data, persuading peers, and observing from a particular point of view. Chinn and Malhotra (2002) constructed a frame for analyzing the differences in the epistemology promoted in authentic inquiry, carried by scientists, and in school inquiry, for instance the theory -data coordination and the response to anomalous data. The epistemic status of students' claims, from lower to higher induction level, has been examined by Kelly and Chen (1999).…”
Section: Contextualizing Practices and Meaning Making: Background Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eräs toinen tiedeopetukselle yleisesti asetettu tavoite on, että sen tulisi olla autenttista. Tiedeopetuksen autenttisuudella tarkoitetaan tyypillisesti sitä, että tiedeopetuksen tulee heijastella tieteelle luonteenomaisia piirteitä (sisältöjen ja työta-pojen osalta) tai, että oppilaille muodostuu totuudenmukainen kuva fysiikasta tieteenä (Chinn & Malhotra, 2002;Gilbert, 2004;Koponen & Nousiainen, 2015;Watkins, Coffey, Redish, & Cooke, 2012).…”
Section: Johdantounclassified
“…In this kind of processes, students do not need to actually think. As a result, they are not curious about exploring things, the space for imagination is limited, and the excitement of finding answers through science is reduced (Bell, Blair, Crawford, & Lederman, 2003;Chinn & Malhotra, 2002;Hickey, Kindfield, Horwitz, & Christie, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%