2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistemic Just and Dynamic AI Ethics in Africa

Abstract: This chapter considers the potential for actualising the ideal for responsible AI on the African continent, focusing on the AI ethics policy environment in Africa. I consider the impact of context and culture on successful adoption of AI technologies in general and on trust in AI technology and openness to AI regulation in particular. It concludes that actionable AI ethics in Africa should be driven by dynamic and epistemic just ethical systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, aligned with the rediscovery of the (moderate) communitarian perspectives applicable to emerging technologies [ 83 ], the distincion of Bell [ 84 ] of the various types of communities sound plausible for the issue of domestic violence and the role of technology in it. Bell [ 84 ] emphasizes communities of a) place, b) memory, and c) psychological communities; all relevant for valued (communal) life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, aligned with the rediscovery of the (moderate) communitarian perspectives applicable to emerging technologies [ 83 ], the distincion of Bell [ 84 ] of the various types of communities sound plausible for the issue of domestic violence and the role of technology in it. Bell [ 84 ] emphasizes communities of a) place, b) memory, and c) psychological communities; all relevant for valued (communal) life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, collaboration and knowledge exchange in AI integration can be enhanced through interdisciplinary project-driven courses that integrate different AI capabilities into cohesive systems (Eaton, 2017). Anticipated challenges and opportunities in AI integration include the need for sensitivity to how the concept of individual rights is interpreted in Africa and how AI ethics regulations are formulated (Ruttkamp-Bloem, 2023). This highlights the importance of considering the sociocultural context in the development of AI ethics regulations.…”
Section: Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the globalized narratives, these policies essentially carry ideologies that amplify the concerns of the global north (Graham 2015). This calls for urgent contextual cultural analysis, interpretation and application of AI and related ethical principles (Hegarty & Rubinov, 2019;Ruttkamp-bloem, 2023), to allow alternative worldviews and epistemologies to legitimately emerge in the current digital order and knowledge production systems Rosendahl et al 2015). Framing of AI strategies, and assembling of the actual policies in Africa, as currently is, seems to overfocus on unlimited economic growth that sustains and is sustained by technology as highlighted by Klein(2014) and is working towards a mythical global corporation (Mclennan 2015).…”
Section: Anticipatory Framing Ai Policy In African Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no doubt AI may produce positive effects on African populations, the question is whose AI and whose benefits is the current AI sociotechnical infrastructure propagating? Sustainable AI techno-futures may only be feasible if AI and emerging technology research, its governance, and related policy debates are premised on African societal needs (Ndaka & Majiwa 2024), shaped by contextual and cultural values (Robinson, 2020;Ruttkamp-bloem, 2023). This ensures that technology applied in Africa does not treat Africans as passive objects and recipients of technological tools (Hoffman, 1990), reducing them to performers of global discourses and regimes of truth as observed by Graham (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%