Abstract:The philosophy of emotions has identified a class of affective phenomena called epistemic feelings (e.g. certainty, doubt, or surprise). Such feelings are thought to inform about the quality of one's knowledge and beliefs and to influence processes of knowledge acquisition and belief formation (1). I shall argue that these feelings also inform about the quality of one's (moral) emotions and hence are important to understand everyday moral experiences and the moral dynamics resulting from them. The works of Han… Show more
“…Power in the Modern era has been operating this way for as long as emotion was discursively separated from reasonto position the revolting as emotional, irrational while the establishment claims to rest on rational and non-emotional ground . Gould's contribution further illuminates the relations between knowing/knowledge and emotions, and her analysis indicates that different emotions are linked to knowing (closure) as well as not knowing (opening), echoing the literature on epistemic emotions (see for instance Terpe, 2016).…”
Section: Mary Holmes Nathan Manning and åSa Wettergrenmentioning
“…Power in the Modern era has been operating this way for as long as emotion was discursively separated from reasonto position the revolting as emotional, irrational while the establishment claims to rest on rational and non-emotional ground . Gould's contribution further illuminates the relations between knowing/knowledge and emotions, and her analysis indicates that different emotions are linked to knowing (closure) as well as not knowing (opening), echoing the literature on epistemic emotions (see for instance Terpe, 2016).…”
Section: Mary Holmes Nathan Manning and åSa Wettergrenmentioning
“…On an experiential and practical level, the future has not only become the arena for the realisation of numerous goals and plans but also a domain heavily 'impressed' by emotions (Ahmed, 2013). Emotions such as hope, fear, anxiety, nostalgia or doubt, considered as epistemic emotions (Candiotto, 2017(Candiotto, , 2019Terpe, 2016), shape the ways in which we approach the future. While Illouz (1997) once argued for an elective affinity between romantic love and capitalism, we could similarly assert a parallel between the future and capitalism.…”
This article introduces a relational approach to studying imaginaries of the future, emphasising their significance in comprehending present realities and the ongoing processes that interweave our social fabric. It posits ‘imaginaries of the future’ as a pivotal sociological concept for understanding the reciprocal social influences and uneven structural dynamics shaping the present. This work engages in a theoretical discourse, spotlighting the role of the future in contemporary social landscapes, while endorsing the suitability of the concept of imaginaries to elucidate how we collectively interlace our present through implicit dialogues with latent, emergent futures and glimpses of radical imagination. In this article, we advocate for sociological research on ‘imaginaries’, discussing the concept’s relevance to sociological theory and research. In addition, we make a case for examining futures as a subject of sociological research. Finally, we propose a conceptual framework for analysing imaginaries of the future from a relational sociological perspective, fostering interdisciplinary dialogue.
“…One can expect these relational dynamics to be of importance in analyses of the collective process of deliberation in courts, which can include actors of different status (lay‐judges, jurors, or a panel of judges). Thus, the model opens the door to a new niche of empirical studies that incorporate how interactional and contextual factors, such as power relations and professional norms, influence people's inclination to develop and hold on to certain epistemic feelings and associated subject positions while ignoring others (Terpe 2016).…”
Section: Toward a Bounded Process Model Of Legal Decision‐makingmentioning
This article analyzes rational decision‐making in court as an emotive‐cognitive process formed in and through social interaction. Current theoretical perspectives have shown how emotion and thought are intertwined in the workings of the human brain but have seldom elaborated on the contextual and structural features of rational‐emotional decision‐making. I propose a model that maps emotional processes and emotional management demands to the temporally extended, stepwise process of rational‐legal decision‐making. I show that (a) the bounded structure of the decision‐making process actualizes different emotive‐cognitive complexes at different stages and (b) the demand for objectivity in rational decision‐making calls for parallel emotional processes and subject positions to remain independent while sustaining social cohesion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.