2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Episodic, rapid sea-level rises on the central Mediterranean shelves after the Last Glacial Maximum: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The marine terraces observed at the vicinity of Al‐Hoceima likely mark several standstills during the rise of the last transgression (e.g. Rabineau et al ., ; Zecchin et al ., ). The presence of those marine terraces (noted as t on Fig.…”
Section: Seismic Facies and Morphology Of The Shelfmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The marine terraces observed at the vicinity of Al‐Hoceima likely mark several standstills during the rise of the last transgression (e.g. Rabineau et al ., ; Zecchin et al ., ). The presence of those marine terraces (noted as t on Fig.…”
Section: Seismic Facies and Morphology Of The Shelfmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The presence of those marine terraces (noted as t on Fig. ) implies that the tectonic features at the seafloor located above 125 mbsl were subject to wave ravinement and sub‐aerial or aerial erosion since the last lowstand (Zecchin et al ., ). As a consequence, tectonic features under the 125 mbsl are likely to be less affected by erosion, but may be masked by more important sediment accumulations at the last lowstand period.…”
Section: Seismic Facies and Morphology Of The Shelfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the analogy with the wave erosion depth of Ferdinandea shoal (-30 m), we can reasonably hypothesize that they were mostly eroded when sea level was at least −60/−70 m below present sea level and thus during the interstadial stillstand of the Younger Dryas (YD), a geologically short period of cold climatic conditions, which occurred between 12.8 and 11.5 ka (Muscheler et al, 2008), when sea level was 60-65 m below the present level. This stadial would have favored the development of restricted abrasion platforms in several regions worldwide (see Salzmann et al, 2013;Green et al, 2014, among others) including the Sicily Channel (Civile et al, 2015;Zecchin et al, 2015), like that recognized at about 60 m bsl on the Terribile Bank (Figures 2A,C,D). Civile et al (2015) recognized along the flanks of several sedimentary banks of the FIGURE 11 | Correlation between mean sea level curve referred to the study area (Lambeck et al, 2011) and proposed possible ages of the volcanism generating the cones of the GVF; see the text for further details.…”
Section: Relationship With Sea-level Changementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar features were recognized on the Anfitrite Bank at 120-130 m bsl and associated with the LGM paleo-coastal cliff by Civile et al (2015) on the basis of seismic reflection profiles. The shallowest step lying at 65-85 m bsl was interpreted by Civile et al (2018) as a NW trending currently active normal fault developed during late Miocene and later reactivated by the transpressive tectonics affecting the Terribile and Nerita Bank, although a correlation with a paleocoastal cliff related to younger stillstands during the last sea-level rise (e.g., Younger Dryas stadial) could not be ruled out (see Zecchin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Morphological Analysis Of the Terribile Bankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The post-LGM sea-level rise induced significant changes in the sedimentary environments of the northern Adriatic Sea with terrestrial environments transitioning in paralic and later shallow marine environments [22,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. In the Gulf of Trieste, where our study area is located (Figure 1), the Late Pleistocene alluvial plain transitioned into a paralic environment until open marine conditions finally prevailed approximately 10,000 years ago [22,42,44,45,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%